PlainSightNetwork / AltRightNation - Daily Thoughts


Daily Thoughts


The Collapse of Western Society

What's happening is evil is taking over the world. Plain and simple. People want to be able to say what they want, do what they want, not talk bad about others and what they do, make excuses for everything that is said, etc. They are getting the effects of that behavior.

They have pushed God and the bible out of schools, public forums all because of a single person complaining and whining and this is what they have left, no moral compass in society at large.

When there is a world of people out there with no conscience, no moral compass to guide them, it creates a world with no conscience for any kind of behavior. And the ones who are deemed 'bad or evil' by one group will be deemed 'misunderstood' by another. Call it what it is. Get back to God. Do what is right. Its almost too late for many.

But don't expect things to get better from here on out. Its only going to get worse. Unfortunately. Because that is the world that is being created. Satan is running rampant. He is ALMOST free to do whatever he wants. But only for a short time.

With the constant barrage of anti-gun/ gun reform talk going on I feel the main point to being missed. The problem is not guns, it is the acceptance of mental illness as a lifestyle.

We used to live in a world where we clearly defined what mental illness is. Today we are being told that children can change their gender, that fat people aren't fat, that everyone is special and that we can all be/do whatever we want.

The problem is that the left, democrats and liberals are constantly telling lies. Telling everyone that everything they ever learned was wrong and that what they are saying now is right.

Muslims are good, trannys are normal, little boys dressing in wigs and makeup is perfectly fine. That grown men pretending to be little girls is fine. That anyone can be any race they want.
Sex and violence have become so prevalent on t.v., in movies and dressing like prostitutes is okay, that we have fundamentally demoralized entire generations of people into believing that every taboo, crime, and mental illness is just you being you.

Guns have been apart of society for a very long time. So have knives, swords, gun powder, sticks and rocks, bow and arrows and any number of other weapons.
These OBJECTS have not changed at all. They have arguably become safer over the years, but they haven't changed. Society has changed. People have changed but the objects haven't. If society wants to fix the violence that is prevalent nowadays we need to get or moral compass back. We need to stop handcuffing everyone into being a soft, passive, feminine version of themselves.

We need to allow a parent to spank. Allow cops to get rough. Allow people to come put and call a spade a spade instead of sitting shriveled in a corner hoping to never hurt someones feelings or upsetting someones delicate sense of being.

Society is destined to fail if we refuse to admit that we are headed for a pussified version of itself. A world where we walk on eggshells whenever we talk to people for fear of losing our jobs or getting the cops called because someones feelings are hurt.

We need men to be men and women to be women. We don't need women in law enforcement. Most women cops can't hold their own against a 6'2" 250lb male suspect who wants to fight.

Trannys and women don't belong in the armed forces. We took a group of mentally ill people and said they were normal and then gave them access to some of the most powerful weapons on the face of the planet.

Women don't belong in the fire department. Yes some women (very, very few) can do these jobs but the majority of them are useless quota fillers who have no business being anywhere near guns or criminals or fires or any of it.

Sometimes a kid needs to be smacked.
Sometimes a fat person needs to be called fat.
Sometimes you act like a retard. Sometimes you are a fag.
Sometimes you need to tell someone to stop acting like a little bitch.

I am just sick of this craziness being perpetuated in society that every one is equal. We are not. There are far smarter people than myself out there. There are people who are stronger. There are people who are better than me at many things.

The difference is I know these things. Today's generation of kids think they deserve everything because they got a participation trophy at their school for simply trying hard enough.

Life isn't fair. No one every said it was and no one ever promised it would be. Grow up and get over it.


I think of consequences of my actions, the effect on my soul and my salvation for my actions. Is stepping on even an insect worthy of consideration, the snuffing of the smallest life, is that a blot on ones soul? For if it is, how then the extinguishing of a human life is not coloring a soul the pitchest black?  

The biggest problem in 2018 is not the deep state. It is that the employees, the executive branch employees that serve at the pleasure of the president of the United States seem to think it's the opposite or even worse, that they are free agents, producing and enforcing their own policies and ideas. That is the legacy of George W. Bush and Barack Hussein Obama.  

The vast majority of people will always be pathetic sheep…and they will follow corrupt and brutal leaders who make them empty promises. That is the legacy we must fight for it is the socialistic tendency of the left to produce just that in the name of correctness and social justice to do just that as they weaponize the govenment and the useful idiotic, pathetic sheep that follow them.  

There is nothing so powerful as a fallen hero, nor anything so readily despised by weak-minded fools.

The human mind aches to believe…in people, causes, trust. People are so easily lied to because they longed for what they were told to be true.

The world would be a far better place if people would just fix their own business instead of trying to shit up everyone else's. How many damn times are we going to see the anti-drug crusader busted for pot, how many times is the counselor gonna get popped for wife beating? This goes for everyone, everywhere. Sometimes I'm positive that half the problems are caused by big nosed idiots shoving their snouts where it doesn't belong. The other half of the time, I'm sure it's homeowner and condominium associations causing the MYOB epidemic. The surest way to stop the epidemic of snout shoving is the get the government out of the way and let the people decide their own affairs, not endless researching to discover what inane rule they happen to be breaking THIS time.  

All the worlds problems can be traced to money and sex. But theres a third one called "not minding your own fucking business"

People have to be all up in other peoples shit because they are control freak psychopaths. If you don't do what they do or think how they think, they will be up in your shit causing you problems. That's right Republicans and Democrats, shut your pie holes about how, where and what I do.  

If you drive how you want to drive, they will lose their shit and pull out in front of you to slow you down if you're going faster than they approve.

Who the fuck are these sad little dickless pricks?  

People need to start worrying about their own shit and stop judging people. That means stop ramming agendas down peoples throats in the lbgt. Why does it bother people that others dislike gays or believe in God?

Just let people be for fucks sakes!

If people want to be racist, let them! Its called ignore what you don't want to see or hear.  

Welcome to the bastard lovechild of Cold War paranoia and outdated notions of American exceptionalism

Message to the establishment: Get your feces compacted, you're going to need it. . The FBI never investigated Trump - all the democrats knew it since 2016, yet  continued to push it. All democrats should be impeached, charged or resign.

In my opinion after watching all of the coverage, I've come to the conclusion that Comey is a very troubled man.  

Fact: Comey is a leaker by his own admission.  
Fact: Loretta Lynch interfered in the election in instructing Comey.  
Fact: Comey leaked evidence in an investigation.  
Fact: Chuck Grassley asked Comey if he ever leaked documents (his memo), Comey said no. That is false testimony.  
Fact: Comey took it upon himself to use government equipment (laptop) to create his memo which he then leaked.  
Fact: The FBI director serves at the pleasure of the president, not the opposite.  

Mark Levin Figures Out The Shitstorm

Mark Levin on Obama: Where is he? Has he gone into the witness protection program? Levin figured it out LAST YEAR)
Levin made the point that Brennan and others are out desperately attacking Republicans but wondered where the heck Obama could be. Why so quiet?

Radio host Mark Levin used his Thursday evening show to outline the known steps taken by President Barack Obama’s administration in its last months to undermine Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and, later, his new administration.
Levin called Obama’s effort “police state” tactics, and suggested that Obama’s actions, rather than conspiracy theories about alleged Russian interference in the presidential election to help Trump, should be the target of congressional investigation.

Drawing on sources including the New York Times and the Washington Post, Levin described the case against Obama so far, based on what is already publicly known. The following is an expanded version of that case, including events that Levin did not mention specifically but are important to the overall timeline.

1. June 2016: FISA request. The Obama administration files a request with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor communications involving Donald Trump and several advisers. The request, uncharacteristically, is denied.

2. July: Russia joke. Wikileaks releases emails from the Democratic National Committee that show an effort to prevent Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) from winning the presidential nomination. In a press conference, Donald Trump refers to Hillary Clinton’s own missing emails, joking: “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing.” That remark becomes the basis for accusations by Clinton and the media that Trump invited further hacking.

3. October: Podesta emails. In October, Wikileaks releases the emails of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, rolling out batches every day until the election, creating new mini-scandals. The Clinton campaign blames Trump and the Russians.

4. October: FISA request. The Obama administration submits a new, narrow request to the FISA court, now focused on a computer server in Trump Tower suspected of links to Russian banks. No evidence is found — but the wiretaps continue, ostensibly for national security reasons, Andrew McCarthy at National Review later notes. The Obama administration is now monitoring an opposing presidential campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of the federal intelligence services.

5. January 2017: Buzzfeed/CNN dossier. Buzzfeed releases, and CNN reports, a supposed intelligence “dossier” compiled by a foreign former spy. It purports to show continuous contact between Russia and the Trump campaign, and says that the Russians have compromising information about Trump. None of the allegations can be verified and some are proven false. Several media outlets claim that they had been aware of the dossier for months and that it had been circulating in Washington.

6. January: Obama expands NSA sharing. As Michael Walsh later notes, and as the New York Times reports, the outgoing Obama administration “expanded the power of the National Security Agency to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections.” The new powers, and reduced protections, could make it easier for intelligence on private citizens to be circulated improperly or leaked.

7. January: Times report. The New York Times reports, on the eve of Inauguration Day, that several agencies — the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Treasury Department are monitoring several associates of the Trump campaign suspected of Russian ties. Other news outlets also report the exisentence of “a multiagency working group to coordinate investigations across the government,” though it is unclear how they found out, since the investigations would have been secret and involved classified information.

8. February: Mike Flynn scandal. Reports emerge that the FBI intercepted a conversation in 2016 between future National Security Adviser Michael Flynn — then a private citizen — and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. The intercept supposedly was part of routine spying on the ambassador, not monitoring of the Trump campaign. The FBI transcripts reportedly show the two discussing Obama’s newly-imposed sanctions on Russia, though Flynn earlier denied discussing them. Sally Yates, whom Trump would later fire as acting Attorney General for insubordination, is involved in the investigation. In the end, Flynn resigns over having misled Vice President Mike Pence (perhaps inadvertently) about the content of the conversation.

9. February: Times claims extensive Russian contacts. The New York Times cites “four current and former American officials” in reporting that the Trump campaign had “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials. The Trump campaign denies the claims — and the Times admits that there is “no evidence” of coordination between the campaign and the Russians. The White House and some congressional Republicans begin to raise questions about illegal intelligence leaks.

10. March: the Washington Post targets Jeff Sessions. The Washington Post reports that Attorney General Jeff Sessions had contact twice with the Russian ambassador during the campaign — once at a Heritage Foundation event and once at a meeting in Sessions’s Senate office. The Post suggests that the two meetings contradict Sessions’s testimony at his confirmation hearings that he had no contacts with the Russians, though in context (not presented by the Post) it was clear he meant in his capacity as a campaign surrogate, and that he was responding to claims in the “dossier” of ongoing contacts. The New York Times, in covering the story, adds that the Obama White House “rushed to preserve” intelligence related to alleged Russian links with the Trump campaign. By “preserve” it really means “disseminate”: officials spread evidence throughout other government agencies “to leave a clear trail of intelligence for government investigators” and perhaps the media as well.

This is bad. Let me tell you a couple of things here. Now we know why [Adam] Schiff and the rest of them are fighting so hard. Now we know why the left-wing praetorian guard Democrat media are fighting so hard, trashing [Devin] Nunes, me, you, and others. Let’s walk through this quickly. Who are they trying to protect? Hillary Clinton. Sean, who else are they trying to protect? Barack Obama. His name never comes up.

So, let me help everybody with this. Loretta Lynch knew about these FISA warrants. [Sally] Yates, the deputy attorney general, the extensions Rod Rosenstein, now the deputy attorney general. He knew. FBI Director [James] Comey, Deputy Director [Andrew] McCabe, [Peter] Strzok, the head of counterintelligence, [Lisa] Page — his girlfriend.

Who else would know these FISA applications and warrants? Let me tell you a little secret. These are counterintelligence efforts. You have to assume the National Security Council and the White House knew. Why would the FBI, Justice Department, keep that from the National Security Director in the White House? Why would they keep it from the deputy director in the White House?

So why would be left out of the president’s daily intelligence briefing? Which I meantioned in March Congress also needs to get a hold of. I am telling you, we’re looking at the FBI, we’re looking at the Department of Justice, we are not looking at all at the White House. Hillary Clinton paid for a warrant. That’s the easiest way we can put it. Hillary Clinton colluded with the Russians. But it appears the FBI at the seniormost levels colluded with the Russians, too. Whether it was witting or unwitting, it doesn’t matter. That’s a fact.

So, the senior level of the FBI tried to interfere with this election as well. This is why it’s such a big deal. Now, I know Republicans are bending over backwards saying this has nothing to do with Mueller. This has everything to do with Mueller.

It has everything to do with Mueller because it transitions from the counterintelligence investigation into a criminal investigation after Comey, of all things, confesses of all things to being a leaker. And Mueller — Mueller is the former FBI director. Those are his people. That is his environment. He’s not out there as some independent force.

But I want to get back to Barack Obama. It’s his FBI, his Department of Justice, his State Department, his candidate. I cannot believe for a minute that the National Security Council didn’t know about this.

And to show you how elaborate this is, now that more information is coming out, we haven’t even gotten to the incidental collection of intelligence on people, including, by the way, [Jeff] Sessions when he met with and spoke with the Russian ambassador, Michael Flynn when he spoke to the Russian ambassador, the unmasking and leaking of his name, the record number of unmasking of American citizens in the Trump world and so forth and so on.

And the American people have been subjected to a massive propaganda and misinformation campaign by the Clinton campaign, by the Obama administration. Let me ask you a logical question, Sean.

Why would the Russians want Donald Trump to be president of the United States when they could get everything they want from Hillary Clinton — whether it’s uranium, whether it’s undermining defense by cutting military spending, by refusing to secure our border? Why in the world would the Russians want Trump as to Hillary Clinton?

Another Political Cliffhanger, Another Sleight of Hand Trick

Have you worked it out yet? We're being led by crooks and legalized gangs.

Here's why - They're always one step ahead with another story to tell. And the public just moves along with them like the robotic sheeptards they are.

They tried to rig an election, when they failed, they tried to tear down the elected President.

Clinton Emails, Sexual Assault Allegations, Steel Dossier, Leaks, Media disinformation campaign, Trump Campaign spying, Trump Administration Spying, Destruction of Evidence, Anwar Brothers, Seth Rich, FusionGPS, Stonetear, PlatRiver Networks, FBI Text Messages, Strzok, the list goes on and on and the best part is that the vast majority of the people have no idea that this is happening because the useful idiots in the lamestream media play along with them in the coverup.

Its very scary how long and how far this deceit has been going. Its even scarier trying to fathom what they'll do to keep power and avoid being prosecuted

We no longer know what to believe. For decades we've been lied to, fed false flags, been accused of being racist, shown facts that don't exist and generally been yanked around like an abused child. Is it any wonder that people would begin to mistrust every one of them?

Their collective motto seems to be: If you can't convince them, confuse them!!

I got a bad feeling/thought during the state of the union speech.

Do they see what we have awakened too? Could they be using Trump?
To tell us what we want to hear?
Just to get us to follow?
And back under control?

I don't want to believe so, but stay aware!

There are two methods that are being used, obfuscation and the brainwashing of the people in this country who have become so incapable of critical thought that they can’t detect truth from a lie. They actually might be able to get away with all these lawbreaking actions that appear to be far worse than Nixon’s Watergate scandal.



The eventual decline and fall of the Roman and Persian empires made way for the Islamic conquests of the region. But the Islamic bandit hordes had no original ideas. Their religion was a hodgepodge of Judaism, Christianity, assorted pagan beliefs and Mohammed’s violent fantasies. The rest of their culture they took wholesale from the Greeks. This game of historical Idiocracy ended with a collection of Arab colonists who call themselves “Palestinians” and claim to be descended from… somebody.


There is nothing so powerful as a fallen hero, nor anything so readily despised by weak-minded fools.

The human mind aches to believe…in people, causes, trust. People are so easily lied to because they longed for what they were told to be true.

Remember, we’re talking about congresspeople here, not sane, rational people.


And You Thought J. Edgar Was a Sick Bastard


Once more as in for like the 10,000th time in a row, Daniel Greenfield has hit the nail right square on the head:

"In the economics of identity politics, Hispanics, unlike African-Americans, are not an enduring group. And that is a serious challenge for Democrats and their leftist allies who treat politics as a game of demographic Risk played with minorities across the states and cities of the United States."

The Memo Plot Thickens

The left keeps digging the hole deeper but the fact, which I tried to get across for years, is that the Obama administration made Nixon look like a toddler in a sandbox.

Defenders continue playing by the old playbook because it has always worked before.

They will continue to try to discredit the memo as a construction of Nunes. And worse. That everyday Americans who tweet about it are bots in league with the Russians.

And they will continue to claim that nothing will happen because nothing has ever happened before.

But there are two key differences:

1. Trump is now the President. Big difference. Huge. POTUS is the most powerful and most informed person in the world. He continues to be underestimated and that's fine. All of this has been carefully choreographed.

2.Even more importantly, the OIG report is comprehensive and will be released soon. The memo is just a tease. It will be impossible to discredit that. And the internet is forever. So all of these attempts will be seen in retrospect for what they are - treason and sedition.

All that said, what we sent Trump to Washington for still stands - get rid of the swamp, establishment and the so called deep state - he's free to choose the order but that's what needed to be done. And THAT said:

What he Said

And as all that happens, Google has found out once more, despite their bestest efforts, the minority of viewpoint on the internet cannot be artificially propped up.


Doesn't Matter How You Parse it, Liberals Are Fucking Nuts

It's exactly what is the matter with liberals. Nothing can convince them otherwise. They're not interested in letting other perspectives or even facts convince them. It is in fact their greatest failing, the fact that law abiding citizens, the public, whose permission is granted to govern allows them to continue which is the people's greatest failure.  

I love it when some journalist or pundit blames President Trump for the current polarization and divisiveness of politics, and the resultant stress, as if he had actually caused it. It reminds us that though some people would never admit to treating Trump like a god, they no less attribute to him mystical and god-like powers, blaming him as the source of their own anxieties. The problem with this nonsense is not just the irrational adherence to a variety of questionable causes and other fallacies, but that the true stressors in their life are hardly addressed, if addressed at all. Worse, the rest of us are left to deal with their problems, which lay on the floor around us.


Most Corrupt Administration in U.S. History Exposed

Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) is a ranking member of the House Intel Committee and has been very aggressive with Deputy AG Rosenstein to find out more information about the phony Hillary-funded dossier.
On Thursday, the House Intelligence Committee quietly voted to make available to fellow House members “a memo documenting abuse of the FISA program,” reports Fox News’ Chad Pergram.

Shortly afterwards, DeSantis said the classified report compiled by the House Intelligence Committee is “deeply troubling” and raises serious questions as it relates to the ‘Russian collusion’ investigation.

DeSantis tweeted, “The classified report compiled by House Intelligence is deeply troubling and raises serious questions about the upper echelon of the Obama DOJ and Comey FBI as it relates to the so-called collusion investigation.”

The classified report compiled by House Intelligence is deeply troubling and raises serious questions about the upper echelon of the Obama DOJ and Comey FBI as it relates to the so-called collusion investigation.

“It is so alarming, the American people have to see it,” Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan said.

“It's troubling. It's shocking,” North Carolina Rep. Mark Meadows said. “Part of me wishes I didn't read it. I don’t want to believe that those kinds of things are happening in this country that I love so much.”

“I believe the consequence of its release will be major changes in people currently working at the FBI and the Department of Justice,” Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz said.

“You think about, ‘is this happening in America or is this the KGB?’ That's how alarming it is,” Pennsylvania Rep. Scott Perry said.



Maybe They Like Beaches?

Here's your theory for you. The false alarm in Hawaii was actually what the conspiracy says - especially when you take into account that the very same thing happened in Japan over the next few days and it comes down to two incredible words that never become less incredible no matter how many times you hear them: Galactic assistance.

Let’s put our interesting story together, now.  When we do that, it goes something like this:

    An incoming missile was noted and an alert was sent out.  Proper steps were taken and best judgements were made.
    The galactic presence on Earth – in the form of UFOs – intervened and deactivated, and/or shot down, and/or sent off course, the potential incoming missile(s).
    The UFOs then stood ‘guard’ over Hawaii for some period of time, revealing their presence in the sky.
    The emergency was declared a ‘false alarm’ – because there were no longer missiles detected by the equipment.


The Shithole Unites

The head of homeland security visited congress on the 16th of January so they could flip to the "make a big deal out of nothing" page of the tired Democrat playbook, spending most of their time grilling the DHS head over what she heard in the big immigration meeting wherein the president (accused by ) supposedly called various shitholes, well, shitholes. At any rate, she said that there was so much swearing going on she had no fucking idea who said what. Of course, Chuck "FU" Schumer popped up on late night television to use the old "make them prove it" page of the old tired playbook, wanting to help Trump begin "the long road back" to prove he's not a racist bastard by (go figure) just going ahead and rolling over for the Democrats.

To which Trump (obviously) laughed his ass off about and refused to roll over.

This is what draining the swamp looks like people. This is exactly what we sent him there to do. Plus it's hysterical watching them try their usual shenanigans.  


When is a false alarm not a false alarm?

Something is fishy in Hawaii and it didn't come off of a boat. To me, the entire false alarm thing has two earmarks - one, how could someone magically press the wrong button by accident and then the entire emergency system not shut the damned thing down until after 38 minutes? Especially when they tweeted within minutes that it was false?

I firmly believe that the entire episode boils down to two words commonly found in all governments everywhere: arrogant condescension.

The Internet Before Time

Way, way back at the beginning of the internet there was a place that people could dial in to (back then you used a modem and your telephone line which believe it or not was not bundled with your internet back then. You got to the internet from your phone line. And it was wires! Anyways, you dialed into this place and you could get to your little buddy list, send instant messages, read the news and all sorts of cool shit - but you had to jump through hoops to get to the internet. Why? Because the owners of this place filtered everything that passed through it so that you would get "accurate" news. Since this was the early days of the internet, there were not a lot of us doing the news and information thing. I started a daily (actually pretty much instant) newspaper that had local news as well as national/world news. I had a investigative reporter in Central America (his editor in Panama couldn't publish what I could - too dangerous) who wound up getting murdered by some gold miners in the jungle. I was invited to NASA for a shuttle launch. Every year I would take two weeks and travel around Michigan and write articles about the people and places I visited.

The only problem was it was all conservative points of view. And AOL refused to use any of it. Not. One. Word. Eventually AOL pretty much died off like bad piece of fruit, stank the place up and most people threw away their vast collection of AOL CDs. And now we have Google, Facebook and Twitter that are doing the same thing but on a larger scale - controlling what people see and it seems like few object.

Here's why it works. Since the 1990s they've had a couple of generations of kids to brainwash in the public school systems around the land into accepting the BIG BROTHER trio of Google, Facebook and Twitter. And they've succeeded for the most part.

Eventually what will happen is that the government will control the internet and you will have nothing but filtered horseshit dribbling out of the anus of your cable company from whence the internet USED to flow,.


The Civil War is in The First Quarter

The left has rejected the outcome of the last two presidential elections won by Republicans. It has rejected the judicial authority of the Supreme Court when it decisions don’t accord with its agenda. It rejects the legislative authority of Congress when it is not dominated by the left.

It rejected the Constitution so long ago that it hardly bears mentioning.   

It was for total unilateral executive authority under Obama. And now it’s for states unilaterally deciding what laws they will follow. (As long as that involves defying immigration laws under Trump, not following them under Obama.) It was for the sacrosanct authority of the Senate when it held the majority. Then it decried the Senate as an outmoded institution when the Republicans took
it over.

It was for Obama defying the orders of Federal judges, no matter how well grounded in existing law, and it is for Federal judges overriding any order by Trump on any grounds whatsoever. It was for Obama penalizing whistleblowers, but now undermining the government from within has become “patriotic”.

There is no form of legal authority that the left accepts as a permanent institution. It only utilizes forms of authority selectively when it controls them.

Why the shithole-lovers are so upset about President Trump's accurate label: There are a few reasons why the President's accurate labeling has raised such ire on the part of the left:

We are in a civil war.

Shithead Democrats Have Been Using Shitholes For a Long Time

What they're actually pissed off about is that Trump comandeered their shithole show.

Do not forget that liberals consider red states shitholes but not shithole countries because they contain a ready made voter base. Some thoughts on shithole countries:

1) Insults only hurt if the one being insulted knows they are accurate. It doesn't hurt to be called "bean pole" if you weight 500 lbs. It wouldn't wouldn't hurt being called a shithole if your kingdom is paved with gold.

2) The entire fantasy of the UN and the globalists rests on the fallacy that all nations and cultures are moral equals. That Kenya, Venezuela, and America are all considered peers and equals in the UN is the height of absurd hilarity, and an insult to the unique genius, accomplishments, and founding principles of America.

3) The observation that political beliefs inspire actions, actions have consequences, and stupid beliefs cause bad consequences on national levels places the blame of shithole nations' status as shitholes on their political leaders, not on external random forces of "poverty", "imperialism", or "global warming". Freedom causes prosperity, and Socialism causes shitholeness.

The shithole countries KNOW they are shitholes, much like the Muslims know they are terrorist insects whose religion is a hilarious fraud, and that's why they are so easy to enrage by calling out their terrorism and barbaric cultural retardation. And they know their shitholeness is due to Socialism and their globalist, statist religion.

So in summary, President Trump just pointed out that the entire world-view of the left (that everyone on Earth is the same, that Communism and Constitutional Republicanism are moral and philosophical equals, and that actions and beliefs don't have any consequences) is a complete lie.

No wonder they're all triggered as fuck.


So several years ago during the Bush administration, before the years of the even worse disaster of Obama, Rep. Steve King and Chris "the tingle" Matthews spent a splendid time over there on Matthew's show railing on and on about how old Georgie there in the White House never watched NEARLY enough cable news shows. How the hell could he be informed about anything important if he wasn't watching cable news shows? On and on went many cable news shows about how out of touch Bush was because he didn't watch cable news shows. And now in 2018, we learn that Trump sits and soaks up cable news shows all the time, fullfilling their great dream of an informed president. But wait. Trump is an idiot because he's watching the very shows that they said Bush was an idiot for not watching. Look, you guys can't have it both ways, accusations don't work like that.

Yet, through the years, we're told that the cable news people are the end all of everything that you need to know. Why they don't even need to wipe their asses because nothing but roses, sunshine and rightous information flows out of their anal passages - that's how serious they are and how rightous their information is. So Trump watches them and that makes him an idiot. Here is my observation about this topic: The on air employees of these cable news channels are stark raving, lock them up insane. Not just the crazy dementia they accuse Trump of but honest to God real insane, like Klinger trying to get discharged by wearing dresses insane. Cookoo nest insane. Mass murderer insane. Saddam Hussein insane. Hitler insane. That's the cable news channel on air employees. Hitler insane. Every. Single. One.

In other insanity, the NAACP wanted people to wear white shirts and wave white towels to protest the president at the NCAA championship game, apparently forgetting that waving white signals surrender.


At conservative tree house, there is a pretty good article about the whole steaming pile of horseshit.

I.Q. deficiency; There are some people who are a few fries short, are a sputtering candle, their elevator doesn't go to the penthouse, they have bricks missing from their mental wall, and what is often a characteristic about every one of these people is that they don't know it. They have no idea how incompetent or stupid they are. It's the exact opposite. They have the loftiest, highest self-image and visions of self importance without ever have done anything noteworthy.

So imagine in the big boy world of politics you have someone who is going undercover like a double naught 7 pretending to be, I dunno, a book author who is writing a book for another person but instead of relying on that other person has to go to the super secret hide out of the target and like any top notch double naught 7 do some of that there super secret spy clue gathering stuff. Ignoring the fact that if you're writing a book attributed and about one person and have to do a secret spy sting operation - and then apparently go all opposite day and turn every interview 190 degrees, why you'd be a hero.

And so we find ourselves with the mysterious case of the never Trump book written by Michael Wolff called as you probably already know "Fire and Fury" which is, if I'm not mistaken a play on Steve "nutbird" Bannon being fired and getting his man panties in a twist who now has come clean and is pinning his hopes on the 25th amendment to the Constitution wherein they can get rid of the most successful president ever which is like Barney Fife having that bullet - right in the foot baby, right in the foot.

What confuses me is that these people apparently want something better for the United States and feel that throwing the country into a near civil war is the way to achieve that goal. Or is it that this is the ACTUAL Russian plot wherein Putin is planning on destroying us from within using his oh so strategically place super secret double naught 7 spies and agents to cause mayhem and division. Either that or the actual puppet master is our old friend George Soros and his gang of henchmen.

No matter how you take apart the plot and reassemble it, you come away with confusion. On the one hand, how can a cra-cra dementia ridden old man twirling around and around in his chair in the Oval Office while staring at the ceiling possibly have the success that he has had over the past year and on the other hand, how can a sharp witted Twitter assassin like Donald Trump be insane? Just because his button is bigger. Has it really come down to this - the size of a man's button is his qualification for office. If that's the case half of these pencil dicked idiots in Washington need to be removed.


The head nitwit, one Albert Gore and his Oscar-winning documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" did not warn of record cold and increasing snowfalls as a consequence of man-made global warming. And as recently as 2009, Gore was hyping the lack of snow as evidence for man-made global warming. Source: “Gore Reports Snow and Ice Across the World Vanishing Quickly.”

Predictions of less snow and less severe winters were hammered into the public by global warming scientists. But once that predictions failed to come true, the opposite of what they predicted instead became—what they expected in one of the most epic comedies of the past 30 years, possibly even surpassing the epic tome of the 20th century, "The Blues Brothers."

If “climate change” is causing record cold and snow, then it would stand to reason that Gore is suggesting that if the U.S. had ratified the UN’s Kyoto Protocol treaty on “global warming” back in the 1990’s — the winter of 2018 would have been warmer with Orange groves as far north as Vermont. Sadly, this is not the case and if anything, Gore and the hockey stick gang have not only been proven wrong, wrong, wrong but I would argue criminally so. Like shouting "Fire" in a movie theater, forcing the entire country and it's economy into a fast track of false redistribution of resources has damaged lives, families and our nation as a whole.

With each sad sniffle and fake warning, the entire premise of global warming via climate change has not only fallen on it's collective fat asses but when we consider the human cost of what these people have done to the young people in the public educational system, brainwashing the skulls of mush into browbeating their parents and communities, it is my belief that we have crossed into crimes against humanity with their efforts.


With the cold snap that's gripping most of the country in it's twisted grey taloned grip, it brings to mind an interview I had with the erstwhile Clif High, the creator of the much maligned so called web bot who told me way back in 2011 that we are heading toward or are in an "ice age." It was big news back then since we were in the full court climate change shirts versus skins game of a lifetime. Now we regularly see below zero winter days and even snow in Florida on a seemingly regular basis or at least too

often to be happenstance. The point that I'm getting at is this: we as a society are ill equipped to be able to survive unscathed a lengthy cold weather period worldwide simply because far too many of us have bought into the just in time delivery system and an almost total lack of self sufficient lifestyles. Hopefully, people can use their vast social networking skills to find a can of Corn in the future or at least a warm blanket for those nights when the renewable energy supply goes belly up during high strain times on the grid.

As each year goes by, we seem to be able to go further and further away from the climate change/global warming scarefest and back into the tried and true ice age mythos of the mid 20th century which, given the activity of the main driver of Earth's climate, the great orb in the sky, we appear to be in for a rather lengthy period of salt on the roads and shovels to the driveway.


We're three days into 2018 and as yet I have to flub the year when writing it. News coming from the den of evil that the new Cleopatra movie remake of a remake will feature the biggest slut of all time from a woman's point of view. The mind reels at the casting possibilities and the wardrobe department scratching their heads over how to outfit Cleo with a pussy hat.

A double edged sword of epic proportions is being predicted, just in time for the 2018 big freeze - yes, it's once again time for the yearly winter time ice age warning to be followed by the world is going to be a big ball of fire warning in April. It's double edged because according to the so called experts, the suns' magnetic output will drop like a frozen rock over the next few decades, causing the global climate to cool down which of course will cause more cloud cover which of course will make solar panels even more useless which get the idea. The good news is that the world's first fusion power plant is nearing completion .


Frankly, I don't want to know what liberal communists think. I could care less. I don't want to understand them, think about what they want, say or do. It's enough that they fight human freedom to pursue life, liberty and pursuit. Jodie Foster recently slammed super hero movies (I have my own opinion since most of the actors in them have decided to side with the communistic, liberal POV which does nothing more than prove the power of public school brainwashing), saying that "Going to the movies has become like a theme park, Studios making bad content in order to appeal to the masses and shareholders is like fracking  — you get the best return right now but you wreck the earth." Which proves my point that self importance leads to overinflation of ones views of the world which leads to dictating how other people should think, say and do. In this case, unlike most everything else she's ever done, Jodie has in fact done a useful service.


There is an engine that powers the likes of the fake news industry, the universe of microaggressions and the self declared perpetual leadership of the social left and that's the three radical R’s of the left: Resentment, Revolution and Redistribution. The entire left resents what you do, how you do it, where you live, how much you make, how you make it, your family and everything else about you. They get even by brainwashing your children. The revolution is under way and has only been slowed somewhat by the current national leadership policies. This revolution was shown for everyone to see during the eight long hard years of another perpetual joke: Barack Obama. The redistribution has been happening for decades. What you have (we're told) doesn't belong to you. The logical conclusion of redistribution is a land where nobody gives a shit but for those who tell you you are worthless - at least their apathy is clouded by the anger that results in revolution.



Human producers refuse to exterminate human predators.  No productive being can succeed while feeding predators who harm, destroy and enslave productive human after productive human after productive human after productive human after productive human... ad infinitum for their entire lives.  No productive human can possibly produce enough to counteract all the harm and destruction done by human predators.

Which means... since human producers refuse to exterminate human predators... that human predators will necessarily prevail. 


Thanksgiving Day


Communism vs. Free Markets at Plymouth Rock

I learned from an article entitled  Our Forefather’s Failure (at that the colonies at Plymouth Rock and Jamestown tried both free market and communist systems—long before Karl Marx was born.

The Pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock in December 1620, and in spite of help from the Native Americans, half of them died the first year as a result of their initial system. During the second year, more of them died. They would quickly learn that their initial system was tragically incompatible with human nature. It was simply unnatural.

The colonists had the ideal conditions for their initial system because they all had a reputation as virtuous hard working people, they all were of the same race, religion, politics, and nationality; and of course, they all had agreed to this system voluntarily. They also knew that failure meant death.

Nevertheless, under their initial system, they simply weren’t producing and storing enough food, which lead to starvation, disease, and discontent. Their first solution, in their second year, was to institute beatings for those who did not work hard enough, but this had little effect on productivity, and it further increased discontent.

The colonists astutely observed that their system tended to retard productivity while breeding confusion and discontent. We know this because they wrote about it in their journals. Clearly, their initial system was incompatible with human nature.

By the spring of 1623 the Pilgrims feared they would not survive another winter, so in desperation, they adopted a radically different system, and it saved their lives. Productivity increased, and in 1623, they had the first real Thanksgiving.

Which system failed the colonists initially, and which radically different system saved them? Which system was so incompatible with human nature, and which system was so compatible with human nature? Which system was so ugly, and which system was so beautiful?

According to their original governing document, the Mayflower Compact, they shared everything produced by any one of them—from each according to his ability—to each according to his need. The result was that only a small percentage of them worked hard, and the rest were freeloaders to varying degrees because they would rather risk death than be exploited by others. They were so reluctant to work that they even left food rotting on the vine! The result was indeed death. Half of them died! This reminds me of the saying by the people of the USSR, “They pretend to pay us, and we pretend to work.”

Then, in the spring of 1623, the surviving colonists decided to let each person keep the fruits of his labor, and the colony’s total output increased so much that they were never hungry again.

The governor wrote in his journal that under their initial (communist) system that some of them claimed to be too sick to work, and they were so convincing that it would have been the height of tyranny to force them work. Then, after they learned they could keep the fruits of their labor, those who were too sick to walk suddenly recovered and began working the fields!

Communism was killing the colonists at Plymouth Rock, and by switching to a free market system, they became more productive and saved themselves—in a single growing season.

The transition from communism to free markets still lacked full property rights however. Whereas each individual owned the fruits of his labor, he did not own the land he worked, and thus he did not own any improvements he made to that land.

In 1623, the colonists were still growing food on parcels of land that were reassigned by random lots each year, which they astutely observed was a disincentive for each farmer to make permanent improvements to his parcel of land because in the following year, someone else would inherit the fruits of any labor he devoted to improvements. Therefore, in 1624, they adopted full property rights where everyone owned the land he worked, and the result was another productivity boost. Whereas, the first step toward property rights and the free market increased productivity enough to feed everyone, the move to full property rights produced enough extra food to export and trade for furs and other goods.

The article goes on to explain the similar experience in Jamestown:

Jamestown, the first permanent English colony in America, established in Virginia in 1607, had an experience similar to the Pilgrims at Plymouth. Early years of starvation were followed by converting to a system of property rights and a free market, which brought abundance. Under collectivism, less than half of every shipload of settlers survived the first 12 months at Jamestown. Most of the work was done by only one-fifth of the men, to whom the socialist system gave the same rations as to the others. During the winter of 1609–10, called “The Starving Time,” the population fell from 500 to 60.

But when Jamestown converted to a free market, there was “plenty of food, which every man by his own industry may easily and doth procure,” wrote the colony secretary Ralph Hamor in 1614. Under the previous system, he said, “we reaped not so much corn from the labors of thirty men as three men have done for themselves now.”

The article didn’t mention the Roanoke colony, which just disappeared, and many speculate that they were killed by the Native Americans, but I think we can all deduce what really happened to them … They were killed by communism.

Although both my first hand experience and observations as well as my research and analysis have long since led me to conclude that the free market and property rights are superior to communism, I would have believed that communism could have worked in the case of the first American colonies because they had every advantage one could give communism. They had already unanimously agreed to communism. They all shared the same race, nationality, religion, political views and economic views. Failure meant starvation, and slackers were beaten, but in spite of every advantage possible, communism was a catastrophic and systemic failure in the first American colonies.

Consider that the colonists at Plymouth Rock had no historical precedent on which to evaluate communism vs. the free market, and yet when communism failed them, they invented and adopted a complete free market system with full property rights in just two years.

In just four years, the colonists proved that that communism was a very unnatural and ugly thing, and that free-markets and property rights were a very natural and beautiful thing.

Our ancestors’ understanding of the superiority of the free market and property rights made us the dominant nation on earth; whereas, today we are rapidly losing that status. Could it be that  Americans have forgotten the hard won knowledge of our ancestors?

Consider that the Barack Obama had 400 years of additional historical precedent as well as a Harvard education, and yet he still doesn’t understand how the free market is superior to communism. He says that that when the government forcibly takes the fruits of your labor and gives it to others to “spread the wealth around”, then that’s “good for everybody”.

Those colonists at Plymouth Rock, who seem so much more in touch with reality than the President of the United States, remind me of small town Americans of my childhood. Of course, the President sees small town Americans as basically racists who have “antipathy toward those who are different” and who “cling to their guns and religion”.

Although, the Barack Obama is a dilettante, whose image was manufactured by the media, progressives have told me that he is right because communism in early America was too soon. They claim that it is not human nature to be a freeloader and that the people themselves have learned and would no longer be freeloaders. In case anyone cannot see that the progressive argument is BS, then consider that the Danish recently proved that 90% still prefer to be freeloaders when they can—even when they can make more money working.


What 90% of people don't know about the American Bill of Rights is that the first 10 amendments aren't amendments - they are the stating, in writing, for the future generations of the obvious. They are what is called codifications or in this case, an arraignment of the obvious in writing.

When you read the first two "amendments", you have to keep in mind that they are neither a remedy or a correction of error. The founders didn't sit around and slap their ample foreheads and say to each other, "Shit, we forgot the damn freedom of speech thing and the gun deal. We gotta amend it." If that's the case, why not just re-write the thing? The amendments as it turns out if you delve into the Federalist Papers are codifications of what are called inalienable rights, or rights that were given to every single man, woman and child, regardless of color or creed by their creator. Not the government, not an agency of the government and not a department, minion or bureaucrat but born with, unassailable by the government.

It's important to understand that some amendments are in fact changes - after all that's what the definition of amendment is. But those first ten are reminders. They are put in writing so some future nitwit in charge of the country bent on tyranny cannot stamp their jackboots and say "no more guns" or some such.

The second amendment did not change anything, didn't add anything and didn't correct a mistake in the bill of rights. It was the result of a disagreement. Consider the rights from the creator part of it. They believed and we continue to believe that our rights come from our creation, not men or government. You can't lose them nor be deprived of them.

James Madison believed that the power held by the federal government would be held back or constrained by it's very structure (we now know different. It's held back by the people who have been pretty lazy over the years). Madison thought that if the central government had only a handful of powers that were clearly defined, that would be good enough. In fact, that's what the constitution is. It defines what the government cannot do. This is why Barack Obama calls it a document of "negative liberties." But he's wrong in that he forgot about the for the people, by the people part of it all.

That's is what the Constitution is, our national charter of liberty and how to maintain it. So any time somebody starts talking about getting rid of this part or that part, we've all got to say, “No way. We’re not going to let you chip away at our freedoms,” which is what the anti-Second Amendment crowd wants to do.

Madison acknowledged this when introducing the Bill of Rights in Congress. The rights he had included, he made clear to his peers, were those "against which I believe no serious objection has been made by any class of our constituents."


Decentralized Militias

During the Jacksonian era, the militia system in the states shifted largely from a compulsory to a voluntary system. Because of this, the Mexican War was first war fought by the United States that did not require a draft (the Civil War drafts are often cited as the first cases of conscription in the United States, but this ignores conscription administered by the states that took place during the Revolutionary War and War of 1812). During the Mexican War, roughly 50,000 troops were raised, all of whom enlisted without any compulsory measures.


Affable television host Mike Rowe recently had enough:

“Since we’re being candid, allow me to say how much I dislike your post. Everything about it annoys me – your smug and snarky tone, your appalling grammar, your complete lack of evidence to support your claims, and of course, the overarching logical fallacy that informs your entire position,” Rowe wrote. “What really bugs me though, is the fact that you’re not entirely wrong. It’s true; I haven’t shared any political opinions this week, in part anyway, because doing so might very well be ‘bad for business.'”

“What can I say? I work for half-a-dozen different companies, none of whom pay me to share my political opinions. I run a non-partisan foundation, I’m about to launch a new show on Facebook, and I’m very aware that celebrities pay a price for opening their big fat gobs. Gilbert Gottfried, Kathy Griffin, Colin Kaepernick, Milo Yiannopoulos…even that guy from Google who just got himself fired for mouthing off. There’s no getting around it – the first amendment does not guarantee the freedom to speak without consequences. And really, that’s fine by me,” he continued.

“So no – I’m not going to share my personal feelings about Charlottesville, President Trump, or the current effort to remove thousands of statues of long dead soldiers from the public square. Not just because it’s ‘bad for business,’ but because it’s annoying. I can’t think of a single celebrity whose political opinion I value, and I’m not going to assume the country feels any differently about mine,” Rowe wrote. “So, rather than blow myself up, or chime in with all the obvious observations about the cowardly scum in the pointy hats, I’m going to talk instead about my belief that comments like yours pose a far greater threat to the future of our country than the existence of a memorial to Thomas Jefferson, or a monument to George Washington. Ready?”

Then Rowe started in on Adkins’ insinuations.

“You say that White Nationalists believe that everyone who goes to college is an ‘academic elite.’ You then say that Republicans promote ‘anti-intellectualism.’ You offer no proof to support either claim, but it really doesn’t matter – your statements successfully connect two radically different organizations by alleging a shared belief,” Rowe said. “Thus, White Nationalists and The Republican Party suddenly have something in common – a contempt for higher education. Then, you make it personal. You say that Republicans “love” me because they believe that my initiative and ‘their’ initiative are one and the same. But of course, ‘their’ initiative is now the same initiative as White Nationalists.”

He continued “Very clever. Without offering a shred of evidence, you’ve implied that Republicans who support mikeroweWORKS do so because they believe I share their disdain for all things ‘intellectual.’ And poof – just like that, Republicans, White Nationalists, and mikeroweWORKS are suddenly conflated, and the next thing you know, I’m off on a press tour to disavow rumors of my troubling association with the Nazis!”

“Far-fetched? Far from it,” Rowe continued. “That’s how logical fallacies work. A flaw in reasoning or a mistaken belief undermines the logic of a conclusion, often leading to real-world consequences. And right now, logical fallacies are not limited to the warped beliefs of morons with tiki torches, and other morons calling for ‘more dead cops.’ Logical fallacies are everywhere.”

Not near done, Rowe wrote, “As I type this, a Democrat on CNN is making an argument that says, ‘because Thomas Jefferson owned slaves, those Republicans now opposed to tearing down his memorial are ‘pro-slavery,’ and therefore aligned with the modern day KKK.’ That’s a logical fallacy.

“Over on Fox, a Republican is arguing that ‘any Democrat who has not yet condemned the Senator from Missouri for publicly wishing that Donald Trump be assassinated, is guilty of wishing for the exact same thing.’ That’s a logical fallacy.

“Yesterday, on The Science Channel, Neil DeGrasse Tyson, a noted astronomer, tweeted that the ability of scientists to accurately predict the solar eclipse, was proof that predictions of global warming were also accurate. That’s a logical fallacy.”

Then Rowe turned the tables on his accuser, continuing, “Want to hear another one? Imagine something like this, unfolding over on MSNBC.

“‘Good Evening, America, our top story tonight… Chuck Atkins is a racist! Why? Because he can’t spell. Just look at his grammar! In a recent post on Mike Rowe’s Facebook page, Mr. Atkins, while bemoaning America’s global academic standing, not only misspelled ‘elitist,’ he used ‘tenants’ when he meant ‘tenets.’ He neglected to use a hyphen in ‘anti-intellectual,’ and he misplaced several commas and apostrophes! But why is he a racist, you ask? Simple. Because everyone knows racists are ignorant. Chuck Atkins is clearly a poor speller. Poor spelling and grammar are signs of ignorance. Ergo – Chuck Atkins is a racist! Boom! The matter is settled!”

“There’s not much we can do about the news, but here on Facebook, I think we can do better. This isn’t Twitter,” Rowe said. “We’re not limited to a few inflammatory sentences and a flurry of emojis. Take a moment, Chuck. Think. Make a rational argument. Otherwise, just link us to a cat video. People love those, and they’re almost never ‘bad for business.’ (Unless of course, the cat gets hurt. People hate that.) Just don’t assume that people will care about your beliefs, if you’re not willing to back them up with some relevant facts and a rational conclusion. Here, for instance, are a few facts that matter to me, with respect to my foundation and the recurring charge of ‘fostering anti-intellectualism.'”


A California mother made it very clear her son would not be describing the Five Pillars of Islam or listening to an Islamic call to prayer.

Tara Cali posted a photo of a worksheet on Facebook she says was handed out in her son’s 7th grade history class.

Titled, “Islamic Beliefs and Practices,” students were to list the Five Pillars of Islam and scan a QR code with a mobile phone or tablet, which would take them to a YouTube video of “a call to prayer at the Blue Mosque in Istanbul.”

Cali was incensed by the lesson and made it clear her son would not be completing it.


This is simple folks. The Bolsheviks want to install the Marxist utopia and they don't care about having arguments about it. If you're an American who values America, its history and its values, and if on top of that you're also white, then it doesn't matter if you're an egalitarian, if you want to help black people thrive, if you accept gay marriage, if you're willing to have rational, peaceful debates, they do not give a shit about any of that. Even if your great grandfather fought the Nazis and you're proud of it, even if you're Jewish.

They don't give a shit. They want to end America, they want to end conservatism (and specially white conservatives) and if you disagree with the slightest premise of their Marxist, leftist, Bolshevik ideology, you're a Nazi and you need to fucking die, and if you don't want to die naturally they will gladly help out.

They want to strike from the pages of history any mention of the white European founders of America and the culture they brought, and eventually even the name America and any sort of remnant of its foundations. They won't stop for anything, you can't convince them, you can't change their minds, we're past the point of no return. There's two choices and neither one is pretty, but in one you survive as a nation and in the other one you don't.


Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.

Knowledge makes one unfit to be a slave.
Fredric Douglas


A nonprofit group that provides substantial financial support to the National Mall says the Jefferson Memorial and other monuments to the Founding Fathers will be updated to reflect their personal records as slave owners.

From what I can see, this will only get worse. IMO, the country is already gone. I am not saying to give up and submit. However, I see no scenario where this sort of thing stops. Sometimes it it best to recognize the unstoppable force and find alternative solutions for oneself and family.

Have A Death Wish?

Texas police academy instructor is letting protesters know that any gun owner in Texas can use deadly force to stop vandalism, destruction, or the defacing of any monuments or statues in Texas.

“As a police officer and police academy instructor, I am posting this as a public service announcement.”
Texas Police Academy Instructor Phil Ryan warns all Antifa and BLM protesters, and anyone else interested in defacing their state statues, that if they bring their attitude to Texas, they could end up dead.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

The First Amendment does not provide the right to conduct an assembly at which there is a clear and present danger of riot, disorder, or interference with traffic on public streets, or other immediate threat to public safety or order.[13] Statutes that prohibit people from assembling and using force or violence to accomplish unlawful purposes are permissible under the First Amendment.

Taking over a scheduled meeting and interfering with the scheduled events without permit is NOT freedom of speech, it is an assembly of disorder. If the persona had sat in the back holding signs and not disrupting, that would be their right. The behavior of blocking and disrupting of a government action is a riot. The police should have proceeded to remove the rioters from the chamber after the officials were safe.


Delusional disorder, previously called paranoid disorder, is a type of serious mental illness called a "psychosis" in which a person cannot tell what is real from what is imagined. This occurs across an entire spectrum of environments from media (print and broadcast), politics and membership in organizations. There is some belief that these delusions are being caused by what is commonly called "brainwashing" which is using drugs, systematic pressure, threat of violence and indoctrination via education among other methods.

The main feature of this disorder is the presence of delusions, unshakable beliefs in something untrue or not based on reality. People with delusional disorder generally experience non-bizarre delusions, which involve situations that could occur in real life. In reality, however, the situations are either not true at all or highly exaggerated

I don't believe in evolution. I believe in the curse of cultures who did not and do not accept God or step away from God, much like the western civilizations are doing now and have in the past.

But it seems to me illogical to believe in and promote evolution and then claim there is something wrong with other people who also believe the same thing but are realistic and practical about their approach to their belief and are outspoken about it.

Why are these people, who are people of all races, called "racist" or "supremacists" as if it is a wrong thing? What is wrong is hatred, what is not wrong (even though I as a Christian believe it is wrong) is believing that their race is factually superior to another. These people should be considered "fascists" who seem to hate it when other people hate the truth. Fascist behavior happens across any spectrum of behavior that does not accept other people at face value.

I don't see why that is not plausible until further information that might suggest a "fascist" wants to  enslave or kill other geographically originating individuals or groups because of their ideology. It is their hatred to opposition to what they believe to be true, which of course, is an unacceptable set of behaviors. We see this with both religion and social dynamics across the world.

There are supremacists, or fascists, in every group, regardless of geographic origination. But there is one truth - and I will remind everyone that there is no macro evolution of humankind and there is only 1 race and other than where your ancestors came from which determines whether a white, black, or Asian child will grow up to be well from having moral parents or unwell from having immoral parents no matter where the parents are from. If there is one single race of humans with variations between geographic ancestry, then the arguments between people based on this are not valid.

I don't believe in evolution, but I can understand why racial supremacists would believe their own race to be better than others. What I don't assume to know is why each supremacist has come to that conclusion.

Some fascists (believing their race to be superior as fact) are such because they were hurt by someone from another race, or because they observed comparative studies, or who knows what other reasons like taking mom or dad's word for it.

Since we know racism is an ideology that runs in every culture and race, which seem to stem from 1 of 4 issues of pride, competition, hatred, or observation, we should think of what is most important instead of going out of our ways to either be a or cause problems for others.

I’m seeing the same things that you do. With all that has been happening over the past month, with all the violence, all the upside down politics, the attempted coup and the clear double standards in polite society where someone whacking someone of a different race on the head with a baseball bat isn’t violence but if someone of a different race whacks someone on the head with a baseball bat, then it is violence like some kind of bizarre Twilight Zone social commentary episode where ugly is normal and normal is ugly but the show is taken off the air because the wrong race was portrayed as ugly. After watching and seeing everything that’s going on out there, I decided I’d better sneak into my basement office and start my daily thoughts once more. I got a shotgun handy too so don’t get any bright ideas.

These daily thoughts aren’t intended as a commentary of the human condition or of the cold civil war but rather in order to relieve my own stress load because this shit is driving me stark raving looney. And I have an offer for you the reader (and I presume just as stressed). Add your words to mine.

Not every single nitwit out there has a blog or a writing platform to espouse their incredible words of wisdom from. And even if they did, they’d only get like 10 readers a day. Instead, let’s all get together and combine our 10 readers each on a single site. Yes, it will increase my workload by a million percent. In the end it is worth it, if not to reduce personal stress levels but to allow similar points of view to be shown the "Hey! That’s what I thought too!” light of day.

So here we go.

Yeah, there’s those WordPress or Blogger platforms and there’s social network platforms as well. But each time you post something on Facebook, what happens? 1. You run the risk of making an innocent comment that gets you blackballed and attacked and 2. Someone that is attempting to foment the very same civil war that you are against makes money to continue their efforts. So I ask you: What kind of idiot does that? The lazy kind that isn’t really serious about their beliefs or the kind of idiot that performs oral sex on their beliefs because it makes them feel good?

There are two groups. One is called the realites and the other the bullshites. The realites are a tribe of people that want peace, want to get along with people regardless of whether they wear their pants around their knees and make up rhymes about raping and cop killing and pretty much don’t care who or what you are as long as you don’t break the law. The bullshitites are a tribe that, if they don’t get their way, use their 12 year old leader’s method of having a tantrum until they get their way and whose way of life is breaking the law and destroying the realites property.


Klaus Eberwein, a former Haitian government official who was expected to expose the extent of Clinton Foundation corruption and malpractice next week, has been found dead in Miami. He was 50.

Peter W. Smith has been found dead. Smith’s body was found in a hotel near the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. His head was covered with a bag, which was attached to a helium tank. He died on May 14, at the age of 81. His death occurred 10 days after his interview with the Wall Street Journal, in which he said that he had sought Hillary Clinton’s deleted emails from Russian hackers. 

Congressman Larry McDonald on Crossfire, May 1983, just three months before being killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets near Moneron Island after the plane entered Soviet airspace.

To be clear - people that tell the truth, that are in a position to know exactly what is happening, why it is happening and how it is happening are either swept from history with "crimes", commit suicide, or have a tragic accident. In Larry McDonald's case, it was the tragic accident scenario. This is why Trump is the perfect man for the job because he talks a great game, is hated by the insiders but never, ever tells the truth about the conspiracy of the New World Order.


Quotations From Larry McDonald
"[T]he drive of the Rockefeller's and their allies is to create a one-world government, combining super-capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control ... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent."[40][41]
(Speaking of Carroll Quigley, a history professor at Georgetown University:) "He says, Sure we've been working it, sure we've been collaborating with communism, yes we're working with global accommodation, yes, we're working for world government. But the only thing I object to, is that we've kept it a secret."[42]
"I personally believe that we don't need a lot more laws, I think we've got far too many laws on the books now, that's part of the problem.... We don't need more government, more laws; we need a lot less. I'm up there [in Washington, D.C.], trying to dismantle a lot of this giant government.... When you 'pass a law' with the current attitude in the Congress what do you get in a law today? You get either more spending, or more taxes, or more controls.... Which do you want? Do you want more spending? I think we've got too much. Do you want more taxes? I think we're taxed too heavily now. Do you want more controls over your life? Does anybody say 'Hey look, I really believe the federal government needs to control me. I want to be a slave. Please tell me how to run every facet of my life.' I don't hear many people saying that. I think most people say 'I think it's time we get the government off our backs, and out of our pockets.'"[13]


Today no war has been declared--and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.

If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of "clear and present danger," then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.




I am producing the return of one of the television series I produced. Stay tuned for information. 

For those that are wondering regarding the distinct lack of thoughts on a daily basis - I am spending more of my time authoring my next book.


From today’s opinion by Justice Samuel Alito (for four justices) in Matal v. Tam, the “Slants” case:
"The idea that the government may restrict] speech expressing ideas that offend … strikes at the heart of the First Amendment. Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express “the thought that we hate.”


This is the new Europe



Johhny Depp: "When was the last time an actor assassinated a president?" I dunno Johhny, about the same time the United States Army hunted one down like a rabid dog and killed his worthless ass.

Road to civil war: 30 Republican congressmen have been attacked since May.


There are people in this country who can safely express their anger. And those who can’t. If you’re angry that Trump won, your anger is socially acceptable. If you were angry that Obama won, it wasn’t.

James Hodgkinson’s rage was socially acceptable. It continued to be socially acceptable until he crossed the line into murder. And he’s not alone. There’s Micah Xavier Johnson, the Black Lives Matter cop-killer in Dallas, and Gavin Long, the Black Lives Matter cop-killer in Baton Rouge. If you’re black and angry about the police, your anger is celebrated. If you’re white and angry about the Terror travel ban, the Paris Climate treaty, ObamaCare repeal or any leftist cause, you’re on the side of the angry angels.

But if you’re white and angry that your job is going to China or that you just missed being killed in a Muslim suicide bombing, your anger is unacceptable.

If you’re an angry leftist, your party leader, Tom Perez will scream and curse into a microphone, and your aspiring presidential candidate, Kirsten Gillibrand, will curse along, to channel the anger of the base. But if you’re an angry conservative, then Trump channeling your anger is “dangerous” because you aren’t allowed to be angry.

Not all anger is created equal. Some anger is privileged rage.

Read more....


The leftist brain trust is going to go full retard today - First Ossoff loses and then the Muslim girl that was murdered - which they blamed on Trump supporters of course - was actually attacked by one of their beloved illegal immigrants.


So Bernie Sanders has shouted fire in a movie theater, racheting up his personal rhetoric, telling a supporter to “act in an unprecedented way,” go “big,” “fight back in every way.” Since that wasn't enough to put him on par with a Banana Republic opposition party member he threw in "cowardly" Republicans just to gin up the base into a killing frenzy. So much for toning down the language. As we all know, shouting fire in a movie theater isn't covered under the free speech insurance coverage.


Today's daily thought comes from an article I did not read because I don't need the stress and generates this opinion: There is no place on Earth for these people.


I'm going into the weeds today which is always fun. First up is Larry Nichols, keeping in mind this is nothing more than a conspiracy theory at this point.

Larry Nicols leaks critical detail he’s been warned to keep quiet about. Ranking theory is he's old enough to not give a shit if he suddenly commits "suicide" or has one of them there Clinton associates "accidents."

Tape of Emergency meeting with Podesta, Loretta Lynch, James Comey, Susan Rice, 2 or 3 other members of the Clinton campaign talking about Comey's press conference and how to make it go away but get everyone to buy into a story that they know is not true.

Lynch was asking Podesta can do, so they were going to help main stream media and have Trump caught up in it. Podesta said some thime between a week and 10 days they will have another press conference where Comey will say he looked into it there was nothing there.... this is all on tape, Obama's people and Comey.

On the tape they called each other by name and asked Podesta if he would call ABC, go to Stephanopoulos. Then they talked about the seriousness of the voter fraud getting out of control and damn that video of James O'Keefe. Podesta asked Lynch what they could to do get him and Lynch said they could prosecute him, etc. This meeting was using the head of the FBI and the head of the Justice Department to help Clinton win the election.

Larry heard the tape but no longer has it in his possession. Larry has been harassed that he needs to keep quiet about this tape but he's already talked about it on several different programs. Yesterday he got a call from someone in the justice department wanting to know about the tape wanting to know if he has that tape because they want it. He keeps telling them he doesn't have it. He just shared what he remembered from the conversation. They said he needed to cease and desist talking about the tape. Larry let them know that he wasn't going to shut up about it. He received a second call about 40 minutes later from same area code from another person inside of the justice department. He said he has already been contacted and they were shocked about the previous call. They wanted to know if he thought the tape was evidenciary and would be significant and was asked if he can get the tape to them. He said he would try. He thinks they need to be calling Rice, Lynch, Comey and anyone else who was in that room they better tell the truth because he will produce the tape if they lie.

At 02:30 local time on 17 June 2017, ACX Crystal, carrying 1,080 containers from Nagoya to Tokyo, collided with USS Fitzgerald near Shizuoka, Japan, about 54 nautical miles south of the Yokosuka, Japanese and naval base at the entrance of Tokyo Bay. The cargo ship's bow and the destroyer's starboard side were damaged. The Fitzgerald's commanding officer and two sailors were injured and evacuated by helicopter, and seven Navy sailors were found dead in the damaged, flooded starboard compartments.

NYK stated that none of the 20 crew members aboard the container ship, all Filipino, were injured, and that the ship was not leaking oil. They also confirmed their full co-operation with the Japan Coast Guard's investigation of the incident, which began the same day. Although the cause of the collision is not yet known, local broadcaster NHK claimed that ACX Crystal made a sharp U-turn just before the collision (based on GPS-transponder data). The ship later continued to Tokyo Bay.The collision between the Fitzgerald and the containership is raising a lot of questions, especially since the containership had the right of way. Primary of which is how in the hell did a state of the art destroyer collide with a gigantic containership? If you look at inversion layers and it's effects on ship based radar, you can see how the entire bridge crew of the Fitzgerald managed to miss a gigantic containership bearing down on them. Of course if you look at where that ship was coming from (the Philippines) which is turning into an ISIS hotbed complete with the bodies in the streets and all the beheading goodness that ISIS is known for an order for the captain of the destroyer to stop that thing no matter the cost because of oh, I don't know, maybe some jihadi warped destruction on it's way to Japan, well that would also make sense.

Link 1, link 2, link 3, link 4

 Of course, there is this account which is probably the one that will see the light of day:

First off I am a USCG Licensed Unlimited Tonnage Master who has sailed high seas for two decades. Mostly as Captain. I've literally spent my entire life at sea and currently work as an East Coast Harbor Pilot which in maritime terms is as high as you can get.

The only way this scenario could have taken place (assuming it is a run-of-the-mill ship collision) is they were in a crossing situation with the Japanese merchant vessel being the stand-on vessel (having the right of way) and the US Naval ship being the burdened vessel (the guy who should stay out of the way).

Think of it this way. The navy ship ran the red light and crossed into traffic that had the green light. Both literally and figuratively. The Japanese freighter was looking at the navy ship's green light (starboard) while the navy ship saw the jap's red light (port side). Red means stop. Green means go.

The jap ship is required by international rules of the road to hold her course until she deems the situation an emergency. Only then can she take measures to avoid collision.

The navy ship was required to alter course and/or slow down and avoid the jap ship. Which did not happen. Believe it or not this is common. Especially with an arrogant prick navy captain who thinks rules do not apply to him.

Or the navy captain had too much confidence in his vessel and thought he could clear in front of the jap ship in time. He thought he could beat the train. Or he thought the train should stop for him.

These vessels take a mile to start slowing down. In cases of a merchant ship that burns a cheaper more heavy fuel oil at higher speeds requires 20 minutes before they can even think of starting the process of reducing from full sea speed to maneuvering full speed to half ahead to slow and then finally dead slow and stop engines. Then they can start the same process in reverse. Dead slow astern, slow, half, and full astern. At which point they totally lose control of the vessel in an emergency crash stop due to severe propeller walk.

When the report comes out, and I can assure you every detail of the accident from both perspectives was recorded in real time, it will show that the navy ship deviated from regulations and international law. The merchant ship though not at fault will share blame because they did not recognize extremis soon enough and take appropriate action in a timely fashion to avoid collision. At that time of night it was the 2nd mate on watch on the merchant jap ship. He should have been seasoned enough. But how often are we all tested in real world situations.

Also if the jap ship with their hierarchy and angry captains prevented the deck officers from making throttle changes on their own and course changes then you have a mid level deck officer afraid to respond to a situation which is common.

I could analyze this to no end. But that's it in a nut shell. The reason the port bow of the merchant ship was damaged was because they altered course to starboard at the last second. Otherwise the navy ship would have sunk for sure.

So now the left is blaming (of course) Republicans for the baseball shooting which doesn't surprise me and probably not you either.  What was an attack on part of our political system, congress to wit (Republican members) has of course become a political game of blame wherein the victims are to blame because they do not accept the leftist exremist view.

The entire blame, in my opinion, does not fall at the feet of the left. No siree. It falls at the feet of the enablers or the moderate population of the left - those that enable extremism in the name of "unity" and "moderation." You see, extremism is enabled not by allowing it and not by creating it (although an argument can be made that the media creates it) but by not disavowing the extremists, by letting them exist under the guise of cause and effect, as a result of behavior or events that are unliked. As an example, the argument that Muslim terrorism is caused by American policy or that the election of Donald Trump foments hatred. Once you get people to accept an enablers or moderate point view, that objection is acceptable, all types of extremism become possible. Yeah, sure people think that Trump stole the election and so certain people are angry. Good deal. I'm angry about a lot of stuff too that happens in Washington but I don't grab my guns and head to Washington to do something about it, nor do I resort to violent protesting about it and I would be that you don't either as well as neither one of us has even considered it, in fact I would bet that most people that aren't of the leftist side of the social/economic/political spectrum wouldn't resort to violence for the sake of it. But enabling and encouraging the opposing point of view (that of the leftists) people can be goaded into violence with verbal rhetoric such as we've seen time and time again over the past however many years - I would put forth since 1776. But just for shits and giggles, let's take a look at the party of the leftists, the Democratic party:

They are the party that was the party of slavery. That's the party that was the party of segregation, Jim Crow laws, poll taxes and literacy tests. That's the party of the 1960s.

The Democrat Party stands for the complete intolerance of debate of different ideas. It's an attack on the circle of Liberty around each of us.

The Democrat Party is an attack attack on free speech on academic freedoms on college campuses. People are intimidated, people are threatened, and people are beaten. And the left lies to you and tells you this is all in the name of Tolerance. Paid for by George Soros and his gang of thugs and paid protesters.

The left stands for not respecting our police officers.

The left stands for rogue cities and Rogue states that nullify federal law. You don't see red (Republican) States nullifying Supreme Court decisions. You don't see the Tea Party breaking windows, or beating people to a pulp, setting fires or rioting. The vast majority of the violence this country is experiencing right now for the most part has come out of the Democrat party, in cities run by Democrats.

That's the party that was the party of slavery. That's the party of the 1960s.

Look at the BLM and Antifa movements, both extremist in nature, enabled by the the moderate view that sure, a segment of the population is mad and thus should be allowed to protest. By the false presupposition that the police are racist, BLM is enabled and dammit, they're going to take care of this cop problem themselves, thus we have nitwits running around taking potshots at police officers. Likewise the supposition that the president is a Fascist you enable the Antfa movement who also are going to take care of it themselves, thus we have mentally deranged people beating up Trump supporters - using violence to punish a political and or social viewpoint is what's called civil war. Enabling allows the protests of these groups to become violent and because their anger is accepted and allowed, they continue to be violent.

I would also put forth that an escalation can be expected simply because the original level of violence hasn't solved the initial problem that the nitwits were protesting about, thus the obvious conclusion would be more violence. Remember who we're dealing with here, the extreme rhetoric by the political, social and media left, ginning up the leftist's base into an insane frenzy and then turning them loose to have at it. Another excellent case is the case of the modern high school Valedictorians who are not using their titles because it may "trigger" less accomplished students which is brought to you by the "enablers" of our liberal bastions of higher indoctrination, formerly known as "educators." And you know how those trigger events can lead to uncontrolled hysteria.

By the same token, if an extremist group with a right wing point of view were created, the same enablers or moderates would not accept them because A. There's no leftist excuse for their existence and B. They do not push forward the left's extremist view and thus should be violently attacked through ginned up aggression by the enablers. That would be the start of a true civil war. Obviously, we're not at that point....yet, but if something isn't done to rein in the violence, the ginning up of the mentally unstable, if we don't get our educational system off the leftist brainwashing, safe spaces mindset, then the problem of the violence will increase rather than decrease. My reasoning is simple.

From the leftist point of view, even after they gain control, the non-leftists must be destroyed and or punished for their point of view, much like ISIS which as you know has observed their 7th century twisted "convert or die" mindset which is more similar to the Democrats, leftists and media than most would admit. Thus, when the leftists have gained control, the violence will continue as either punishment or as a "convert or die" solution to any opposition. Likewise, when the leftists aren't in control, they will continue their punishment or their "convert or die" solution to re-gaining power.


Looks like Trump is right....again. This time he's pissed off about Hillary getting the soft treatment and he gets his ass reamed 24/7 when they're not shooting Republicans (and blaming them for it). Apparently, Donald doesn't realize that he's the president and in charge of the executive branch - maybe he should have a special prosecutor named to look into Hillary's shenanigans. He can do that, you know, because he's the damn president.


Here's what we can take away from the baseball shooting: Instigating anger to the point of physical action never works out for anyone. Which of course had morphed into a gun control issue rather than an issue of instigation in the extreme.

I feel that it's important to separate some parts of the baseball shooter story as to how he got to where he was. An honest person would admit that we all know people like this - pure hatred of conservatives without any basis in experience. What I mean by that is there are people that have a hatred of someone or some point of view that isn't based in any experience that they've had but rather have been told that others have had experiences that come from the leftist/democrat playbook - taking food from children, killing old people and the latest page in the playbook, ruining the disaster of Obamacare (tm) that will kill people we tell ya, kill them.

Don't get me wrong, that clown was crazier than a crap house rat but the focusing of his anger, his hatred that he put into action (unlike Antifa or BLM which seem to use lootin' and torchin') was brought about by the media and "outspoken" political figures whom have time after time used violent rhetoric in their hatred that trigger people like this.


For those of you frustrated with the lack of investigations, arrests and other joyous events regarding illegal activities by former high level government employees: The people Trump and Sessions are going after are the most slippery people in the world. Trump is not stupid. If he doesn't dot all the T's and cross all the I's, these people could walk. They have the ability to bribe and pay off judges, witnesses, they have rogue elements of the government at their disposal, the best lawyers money can buy, the MSM, wetworks, the list goes on. He knew what this battle would consist of and to fight it and win he cannot make any mistakes. You are slowly but methodically seeing all of this play out.

You also have to consider the thug life professional rioters who will be out in droves if anyone from Hillary to Lynch to Comey are investigated or indicted.

So the ambassador to Qatar has up and quit because the she didn't like the way that the president was telling everyone the Qatarians were supporting 7th century throwback terrorists destabilizing the entire region and we're supposed to feel sorry for this loser who thinks the president is doing the wrong thing by trying to stop support for terrorism. Apparently she also forgot who she works for. Not to mention she doesn't even know that America is a republic. All that of course has triggered some nitwittery regarding our super duper Sinbad command center in Qatar.

Our base there is what protects them and their regime which is why they built the infrastructure for one of our major bases in the middle east. It's also why we have our other allies in the Middle East pressuring them instead of us doing it. This is master level 4D chess at it's finest. Qatar houses nearly all of the Hamas leadership, they fund tens of millions towards the Muslim Brotherhood in all the neighboring nations and they have huge support channels to Hezbollah. The Arab states are also pissed at them for their Aljazzera media which has been inflaming uprising for over a decade now. They have finally pushed too far.

The ridiculousness that we have an ambassador who complains about actually doing their job and laments having to answer for the presidents comments is the height of absurdity. Why in the hell did Obama hire this women to even do? Procure underage child sex slaves for the DNC? Because being an ambassador is obviously too difficult a task for this chick.


Many of us have taken care of our parents as they age, becoming less independent; the child becoming the parent. But, what about older citizens seem to stay in public life or the spotlight longer than they should. A normal part of the aging process is loss of some mental facilities, sharpness, memory and motor skills. It's as enviable as gravity. Some people exhibit these issues more than others.

Senator John McCain seems to fall into the "exhibit more" category judging by his latest "comments" that sound more like my dementia addled mother than a United States Senator. Get this - this clown thinks we were better off with Obama. He actually thinks that Obama gave us better "leadership." You mean when he bowed to every half witted idiot that came along, John? Or maybe you mean that time he took the trillion dollar bailout and well, didn't use it for what he said he was going to. Or maybe you mean the second bailout. Or perhaps when our ambassador got dragged through the streets while he was being killed. Is that the kind of leadership you think was better, John, 'cause I'm not really clear on what part of our national nightmare you're talking about. Maybe you could just step outside for a minute and tell us what color the sky is where you are.

Of course, there's other possibilities brought to us by Arthur Arokhamoni

McCain's beefs with President Trump are:

1. That he succeeded against Democrats. Which implies he is better than McCain.

2. He succeeded without asking McCain for advice. Indeed he unloaded on McCain during the primaries.

3. McCain discovered President Trump cannot be bought.

The establishment as everyone pretty much realizes by now is populated by 1960's drug addled poster children who are realizing that the reality they have carefully crafted as the matrix they wish existed has more holes in it than premium Swiss cheese.

Their demands that every newcomer into Washington submit to the rule of the establishment until said newcomer has "paid their dues" fell on deaf ears with Trump and his administration - see the attacks by the deep state/establishment as your proof.

The establishment's delusion which borders on incoherence, fails to see that Americans don't want their Marxist rules and regulations, nor do we want to exist under their ideas of American life or dream.

It's time to place them on the curb to be taken to the trasheap of history and finally strike their ideas from existence. At this point, it's gotten so obvious that the establishment/deep state is on the wrong side of history and it's become so painful to listen to and watch the break from reality like the mental patient that needs a padded room that it's time to remove them from public life.


There's an article about the current state of American politics and the press at a site called Tablet which points out what I've written about since the middle of 2016 but from a different direction. My belief is that the United States has politically become like a Central American banana republic from the 1970's.  The author, Lee Smith, at Tablet, takes the view that we're more like a middle eastern shithole which actually may be more accurate.

One thing is clear already: What started as an explosion of shock and anger about Hillary Clinton’s surprise defeat in November has tipped over into the kind of toxic fabulism typical of Third World societies.

The Comey testimony signifies that we have retrofit the architectural features of our democracy in order to legitimize an alternate conspiratorial universe. Comey’s testimony, the Senate and House investigations, former FBI Director Robert Mueller’s appointment as special prosecutor make sense only if you believe the narrative of high-level treachery and espionage that has been leading the network news for the past six months. If you believe the Great Kremlin Conspiracy Theory, all the stories are true, in their essence—even if the specifics of any particular story are wrong. If you don’t believe it, then you’re on Trump’s side—and in bed with the Russians.

Smith makes the same point that Limbaugh makes but beats around the bush to make the point that it's the seriousness of the charge, not the evidence. Just because you didn't do it doesn't mean that we don't think you would have given the opportunity because everyone knows that you sir are a demon and are evil I tell ya, EVIL!

The problem with conspiracy theories—or the advantage of them—is that they’re difficult to disprove. For instance, consider that there is no evidence showing that the Trump campaign actively colluded with Russia in a plot to “hack” the American election, and yet the story persists—with no less a party than Hillary Clinton, who now asserts that the Russians were aided by “polling data” from an inside source.

But wait: Weren’t the polls dead wrong? Wasn’t that the big story of the 2016 election? Maybe polling data was part of the conspiracy, too. You see, elements of the Deep State aligned with the Trump campaign used Kremlin hackers to break into ADA, the Clinton camp’s billion-dollar AI that determined where the campaign’s resources would go. Trump’s Kremlin buddies deleted the states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania from ADA’s memory banks, making it impossible for Clinton to travel there.

Smith also points out that the polls were all wrong leading Hillary to say they were weaponized misinformation because, as we all know, the Russians control the polls and then hits the middle eastern shithole angle.

In other words, the American media has become just like the Arab press, consumed by savvy audiences not for the news it actually publishes but for the various pieces of information disclosed between the lines. In Lebanon, for instance, readers and viewers know which journalists are owned by which political figures or security services. This guy is close to military intelligence, which is controlled by Hezbollah, and this guy is known to be close to the Saudis. Oh, if X is saying Y that’s because A is sending a message to B about C. It’s the same throughout the region, where different regimes speak to each other via the journalists they’re known to control.

That’s what much of the American press is like now. It’s political warfare among the country’s bureaucrats and the political elites—a game for insiders, in which the press, Democratic political operatives, and parts of the intelligence community run information ops against each other while playing on the credulity of the rubes. If you don’t know the score, then you’re the target. In the meantime, however, the public sphere is being degraded, perhaps beyond repair.

The entire point is that we don't get the full story from the "press" and have to rely on sites like this one for anything approaching the truth which really sticks in their collective craw. If this really were the middle east or Central America, political opponents would be dropping like flies along with judges as they were all suicided, hung, beheaded or however else they kill people in shithole countries. What we actually have is all the middle eastern/Central American shithole without the blood.


Message to Bernie Sanders - Please copulate with yourself. You want Christian bigotry, there you go asshole.

"Here's a perfect reflection of the banality of modern American middle-class life." I happened across a comment about an unrelated subject that used that line. I thought in my innocence that this would be a great jumping off point to write about how the struggle of the middle class is becoming harder and harder as more and more wealth is redistributed.

You would think that this subject would be rather easy to write about and it was until I did a search for "banality of modern American middle class." What I came across was nothing less than a depressing rote telling of how the middle class have ruined society, American land and now the trust fund upper class have to work to maintain because it's now cool to pretend to be middle class as your standard of living decreases, so here it goes and as an added bonus, we're now told to be productive until the day we die, die, die.

Anyways, here's what I eventually came up with: Dead, joyless, monochromatic, full of shuffling zombies, aimless, pointless, in debt to supply themselves with the shiny nick nacks and electronics they desire. It is truly frightening because we are all just a few days or months from homelessness and nobody seems to realize it. Without knowing how it works or even why, the vast swath of American society struggling to keep both their lifestyle and standard of living afloat doesn't realize how precarious their hold on life is. There isn't any realization that without every cog meshing correctly in society, what they have and enjoy would vanish seemingly overnight.

The supply chain, just in time delivery, the food production, the production of overseas do-dads and nick nacks, the lack of oil refineries that from time to time produce a 50 cent a gallon price increases, the product line of modern society are a house of cards that, while glued together, nevertheless can come crashing down into a pile of our former lives in short order. If appearances are any indication, we are all blindly going about our lives without realizing it, allowing the banality of our lives to dictate our unpreparedness to deal with the inevitable disasters.

This, in my opinion is why people become sheeple - their mental health demands that they ignore the truth and become the willingly brainwashed, willingly ceding to the Stokholm Syndrome of the establishment. The supporters of Donald Trump all seem to recognize this and realize that the path that the establishment has set us on will have only one end result: serfdom to the upper class, the establishment and it's minions, for that is what you get when you enable and allow a ruling class in any society and government.

A lot of our readers have asked what kind of server our site runs on to make it so fast. After some thought and discussion, we've decided to release this rare photo of our server farm in Spamistan, the former Soviet client state located between идиотстан and пьяныйстан.



Message to the leftists / liberals / Trump haters / establishment: Get your feces compacted, you're going to need it.

The FBI never investigated Trump - all the democrats knew it since 2016, yet continued to push it. Why? Is their hatred of the president so big, so all consuming that even though, in closed hearings, they all knew this that they would risk breaking (yet another) law in pursuing an obvious illegal activity? All democrats should be impeached, charged or resign. And half of the republicans as well. In fact, let's go ahead and do what they think Trump was going to do.....the Kangaroo court for crimes against the state. After all we have all those FEMA camps lying around all empty and shit. Even better, we can put all the illegals and "refugees" in there with them and give them their own Shariah law to live under since they seem to like that shit too. If they want to whine and cry about something, let's give them something to whine and cry about - how's that for some of the "Dad" talk?

Comey confirmed that under our Constitution, the president has the authority to direct the FBI to stop investigating any individual. I paraphrase, because the transcript is not yet available: the president can, in theory, decide who to investigate, who to stop investigating, who to prosecute and who not to prosecute. The president is the head of the unified executive branch of government, and the Justice Department and the FBI work under him and he may order them to do what he wishes.

As a matter of law, Comey is 100 percent correct. As I have long argued, and as Comey confirmed in his written statement, our history shows that many presidents—from Adams to Jefferson, to Lincoln, to Roosevelt, to Kennedy, to Bush 1, and to Obama – have directed the Justice Department with regard to ongoing investigations. The history is clear, the precedents are clear, the constitutional structure is clear, and common sense is clear.

Yet virtually every Democratic pundit, in their haste to “get” President Trump, has willfully ignored these realities. In doing so they have endangered our civil liberties and constitutional rights.

Now that even former Director Comey has acknowledged that the Constitution would permit the president to direct the Justice Department and the FBI in this matter, let us put the issue of obstruction of justice behind us once and for all and focus on the political, moral, and other non-criminal aspects of President Trump’s conduct.

Read more....

In my opinion after watching all of the coverage, I've come to the conclusion that Comey is a very troubled man.

Fact: Comey is a leaker by his own admission.
Fact: Loretta Lynch interfered in the election in instructing Comey after meeting with Bill Clinton.
Fact: Comey leaked evidence of an investigation.
Fact: Chuck Grassley asked Comey if he ever leaked documents (his memo), Comey said no. That is false testimony.
Fact: Comey took it upon himself to use government equipment (laptop) to create his memo which he then leaked.
Fact: The FBI director serves at the pleasure of the president, not the opposite. The executive branch employs the director. Any other point of view is false as well as may show either a mentally compromised individual or a willful violation of responsibilities.


If you like a good conspiracy like I do you'll love this. You probably know what the Mandela effect is, where something that you've remembered all your life is suddenly different. Well, there's a sister conspiracy where our entire reality changes from time to time where you may switch realities or universes (called branes). Apparently this was on full display on 6-8-17 for the entire world to see and experience. If you were watching the cable news channels while Comey was testifying, you probably noticed that the entire Russian collusion thing flew out the window and went far, far away into political never-never land.

After a while you probably noticed the former head of national intelligence, a one James Clapper showed up on CNN and apparently was speaking to us from a totally different brane because he said that Comey's testimony proved that the Russian thing is bigger than Watergate was. So either in his universe, Watergate was no big deal or he heard something totally different during the Comey testimony. Or he's insane.


You must remember: Your enemy has only images and illusions, behind which he hides his true motives. Destroy the image and you will break the enemy.
    -- Bruce Lee

The nitwittery begins today as the coming of the great and wonderful Comey descends upon clouds of fleece with choirs of angels singing in the background.

Sadly, all he's going to do is show us all how unfit he was to head the FBI and his lack of understanding of law enforcement as well as shed some light on the inner workings of the deep state ('Stato Profondo'). Which is typical of the establishment in Washington who believe that we serve them, that they are in charge, that our democratic republic doesn't exist.

The Senate Intelligence Committee released James Comey’s prepared testimony a day early on Wednesday, and it looks like a test of whether Washington can apprehend reality except as another Watergate. Perhaps the defrocked FBI director has a bombshell still to drop. But far from documenting an abuse of power by President Trump, his prepared statement reveals Mr. Comey’s misunderstanding of law enforcement in a democracy.

Mr. Comey’s seven-page narrative recounts his nine encounters with the President-elect and then President, including an appearance at Trump Tower, a one-on-one White House dinner and phone calls. He describes how he briefed Mr. Trump on the Russia counterintelligence investigation and what he calls multiple attempts to “create some sort of patronage relationship.”

Read more....

Of course, the article is in the Wall Street Journal and proceeds to go lamestream media on the president, doing a grand job of mocking president Trump as "naive" when the opposite should be stated - he is not part of the establishment, doesn't want any part of it and ran as a private citizen attempting to correct the self destructive behaviors in Washington that publications like the Wall Street Journal enable through their coverage of politics


June 6th marked the anniversary of D day, wherein 19 and 20 year olds of every race, income and education fought and died to defeat the Nazis and Hitler. The world united to kill, yes kill as in shoot in the head, evil and those who supported and perpetrated said evil. The question has to be asked - would this generation, right now, line up to defeat evil? I would submit that the answer is no. Oh, some would volunteer to fight, we saw that after 9/11. And yes, I know that there was a draft in place back during WWII but that's not the point. We have a volunteer military. In fact, I would put it to you that Washington elite don't have the wherewithal to pass legislation imposing a draft. If a draft were to be put in place now, there would be violence against it, all the talking heads would sprout additional pie holes in their fury over having a draft to protect freedom which is actually kind of funny, using violence to protest using violence. After all, freedom and fighting for it is so old fashioned and everyone knows that we need to understand and submit to evil instead of destroying it. Don't laugh, it's what we're doing. Oh woe is us. We live in a world where everyone gets a prize because keeping score might make somebody cry, where oh my God, second hand smoke might kill me 10 days sooner, my Chicken McNuggets are cold - call 911!

We live in a world where we are at risk from evil and I would submit perhaps more than at any time in 70 years, where terrorists can attack anywhere they want because they're welcomed wherever they show up despite what we know about them. Used to be they'd have tanks and fighter planes but this latest interation they have vans, knives and suicide vests. Used to be that bombs would fall from 30,000 feet. Now it's from ground level. Forget the SS, we got ISIS and nobody is standing up against them when they invade in their Trojan Horse painted like a refugee. Instead we live in a world where tearing up a piece of paper, the "Paris Accord", is the end of the world. You know what's the end of the world? The Muslim Brotherhood taking over from within the American government. Because of the watering down of understanding the world, the destruction of critical thinking, the brainwashing of generation upon generation of children in the ways of Stalin, we simply do not have the guts to stand up to evil. Look at the evidence - terrorists attack TWICE in London and Donald Trump is the problem because he had the audacity to point out the cause? Seriously? That right there is total and complete horseshit. We might as well clone Hitler and give him Europe because that's exactly what is happening over there and few if any have any concerns about it.

We have a culture - at the media, leadership and entertainment level - that subscribes to total insanity in what they believe. Our society has become a comedy skit because nobody would believe that Al Gore saw fish swimming in the streets in Miami because of global warming. Nobody should believe that the 7th century terrorist squads are "refugees." Monty Python would be hard pressed to do this comedy skit that we're experiencing in real life.


So the mayor of London, one mister Khan (no word from Captain Kirk as yet), says there’s nothing to be alarmed about over there in England what with the military traipsing around and concrete slabs going up willy nilly to prevent the next culling of infidels via motor vehicle. One thing that extremists and leftists agree on: infidel culling 7th century throwbacks are misunderstood. There is, of course one highly effective way to prevent the next infidel culling that works every time it’s tried. Don’t let the infidel culling bastards in in the first place.

While that might seem like a no brainer solution, when you have leftists and idiots in charge of your security, there is no solution that doesn’t take 10 years and 500 committee meetings to finally decide to do nothing about letting 7th century throwbacks into your country because you just can’t have security since it’s “not fair” to the 7th century throwbacks. Look at this way. We're dealing with "people" that think running people over with a van in like fishing, stabbing folks is a lot of fun, slicing a girl's thingie off to keep her from enjoying herself when she's dragged off and force married at 6 years old, people that think it's fine and dandy to whack off heads of people that don't agree with them or throw rocks at them until they're dead. How can this mindset be understood, accepted or allowed to mingle uncontrolled in polite society?

Of course, the lead response to deal with the 7th century throwback is to stand in front of a microphone and shake your lower lip and cry like a crocodile while trying to figure out why the 7th century throwback doesn't like us and then hold a vigil after the 7th century throwbacks go on a nice drive and run over everyone you love and then hop out and slice open every throat they can get to. And don't forget gun control because it would be mean to shoot the fuckers before they kill everyone you love. And for good measure we need to control the Internet too because everyone knows that without the Internet, 7th century throwbacks will behave themselves in polite company.

The crux of the matter is that there is a class of people above the 7th century infidel killers population of targets which negates their ability to protect us. The political classes travel with bodyguards, have security, armored vehicles and don't have to wait in lines. Even the entertainers that did their supporting concert in Manchester flew on private planes, traveled in armored vehicles, had bodyguards and didn't have to wait 4 hours to get on the plane or in the concert arena. They come in and go out through private entrances, eating Caviar instead of fish sticks. How can we expect these people to protect us when they have no idea how the victims live? Even president Trump lives far and above in a different atmosphere of security - there aren't any infidel killing 7th century throwbacks that are going to scale the Whitehouse fences, they're going to go after the regular infidels. While Trump understands the humanity involved, how long will it be before he loses touch with that very quality that got him elected?

On the other hand, we've allowed the ruling classes to dictate to us, the people, our very own security. Everyone who doesn't want to get to experience a 7th century infidel killing spree should protect themselves, not depend on the state to do it for them. Far too often the people and organizations we rely on to protect us don't - as was the case in London. The authorities had him and let him go. The question we need to ask that nobody is going to is "Why should we trust the government to protect us?" People are so glued to their magic boxes that they aren't aware of what's going on around them, aren't aware of who is around them, doesn't look for escape routes in every situation. Like it or not, our leaders have let killers into our towns and cities without a care or thought. Now it's up to us to do what they don't bother to do


I just figured something out. I've noticed that whenever Trump has a meeting or visits someone, they come away happier than a cat at a mouse convention. I'll bet it's because Trump comes right out and says what he means. No political nitwit does that, instead they beat around the bush until the poor thing is a tumbleweed. Innuendo and ivory tower self imporantance is no way to run a country and we're seeing that on display every day.


The conspiracies flew fast and hard about Kathy Griffon and her entry into the worst idea of the year contest with my favorite being the "leftist transvestite" who knew that she wouldn't go to prison because nobody can figure out which sex she is. Wow.

The spectacle of Kathy Griffin's offensive photos, the crocodile tears and finally blaming Trump for the whole thing has been entertaining but have you wondered exactly why Kathy Griffin chose to be the fall guy for the insane quarter of the left? It's not like she woke up the other day and came up with what she did - it takes a little bit of effort to make a fake head to look like the president, lather fake blood on it and then pick the right outfit, pose and whatnot. Maybe it's because it's been Amy Schumer this and Amy Schumer that and she's jealous - which of course gives Sarah Silverman the opportunity to be number one in the crazy leftist comedy chick world.

What's more, to choose the victim card when getting the level of blow-back for this stunt is simply not something that a normal person would do, especially a celebrity of some renown.

Of course, it's obvious to everyone that Kathy wouldn't have done this photo op of beheading the president without first consulting both her legal and publicity representatives before the shoot. Or would she? She had to have known the risk of getting convicted for threatening the president when she did this, and knew she might throw her career out the window, at least temporarily, or did she? My guess is the career wasn't going so hot anyway, and she wasn't selling out her shows like she planned, so she figured there's no such thing as bad publicity when you aren't doing so hot in the first place. The entire point being that it appears to outsiders that she did not think the entire stunt through.

What she probably didn't expect was the extreme blow back from the her kind, the insane left, as well. To me, it's obvious that her world view places herself above everyone else, and she felt the insane left would support her no matter what. I've had plenty of contact with the high horse gang of self righteous nitwits in my life and Kathy Griffin has one of the biggest high horses I've ever seen. That horse must be 50 hands high. This is the environment that has been cultivated - the more crazy you make yourself look, the more popular you are and by default the more self righteous you are. Look at Maxine Waters - now that is one crazy chick and she's God like popular. She probably reasoned that since nothing happened to the group who made the naked Trump statues, nothing happened to the Buzzfeed employees and there's like a bazillion threats on Twitter that threaten Trump, nothing happens to Maxine Waters, so she probably figured on being a feminist leftist hero and that nothing would happen to her, too. In another case, a man was arrested outside the White House. He was pacing erratically near the White House tried to hit an officer with a radio, then he allegedly attempted to grab the officer's baton when officers tried to arrest him, and then he began behaving violently and banging his head against the car after being arrested. That dude has an appointment with a rubber room a funny jacket and a spooky therapist.

At any rate, to say this wasn't preplanned would be absurd. You have to line up the photographer, publicity, do press releases, make sure people know about it. The hateful photographer is supposed to have approached many other left leaning celebrities, who after consulting with their agents and lawyers, all declined to do the photo shoot. Why would they do that besides possible celebrity suicide? Because if the photos went south, and they couldn't manage damage control, they might get what is called arrested, tried and convicted. Not a smart thing to do with your life - it's a pretty bad life choice.

Which brings me back to she decided to do it, because convicting her of threatening the president and locking her up in prison would be a logistical nightmare in terms of publicity and popularity.

So what goes through the mind of someone who creates, plans and then executes a really, really, really bad publicity stunt? Is it the insanity of the left on display? Has it gotten to the point where any Republican elected to high office is by default threatened? Are we at the point in America where we are seeing the results of the brainwashing by the leftists? The answers to that my friends consist of exactly one word for each question: Yes.


How stupid are these people? This stupid: Debbie Wasserman Schultz Uses Voice Changer To Call Law Firm Suing DNC - Forgets To Disable Caller ID

The parade of claims that president Trump is going bananas, has old timers disease, has dementia or whatever brain ailment continues without so much as a pause, this time involving the interviews for FBI director wherein claims of him being "distracted" during the interviews like the whole process is a cattle call for the local Wal-Mart.

What they're failing to realize is that it's all a game and interview style. They would know this if any of them were actual business people and not some high horse journalist.

This is how the cabal controls countries:

First you get flooded with cheap drugs.
Then they start the terror.
They scare tourists and foreign companies.
Embargo, tariffs, taxes.
They crumble your economy and start a revolution.
They then try to install a puppet government.
But if they fail then you are accused of using illegal weapons and invaded.

There's a few reasons why it's failed so far in America. The depth of knowledge, experience and belief in the idea of America is still too strong. But, with the educational system churning out safe space experts and highly trained disruption specialists, you can be assured that once the baby boomers are gone it's going to be another socialist/communist utopia. Although, there is an argument that the path of least resistance would be a modified oligarchy would be the best bet to kill America. The issue with the oligarchy idea is that once again the educational system is going for socialism rather than anything that resembles today's system. The question is this: will there be enough people in the country to resist or conduct a counter revolution?


So Trump pulls out of the Paris "accord" (quick fact: All the other countries call it a treaty - there isn't a senate in U.S. history that would ratify this horseshit, so we call it an "accord") which is actually a treaty. The usual and normal suspects are whipping out the crying towels with much pomp and circumstance including the destroyer of countries, Barack Obama.

The thing is that as is usual with the progressive crowd, any "accord" that the "consensus" of countries around the world come up with will always treat America like the idiot cousin (until a Hitler comes around and then it's all "pleaaaaaase help us) so I have a suggestion. What Trump should do it draft his own climate "accord" that benefits the United States and get all of the other countries to get on board. No negotiations, take it or leave it. What always strikes me is that every other country looks out for number 1 and expects us to not do the same and they hate that, just hate it when we do.

Another item is the total meltdown of the progressive/liberal/leftist/liberation theology crowd and their objections, while of course, they flit around on private jets, lounge around houses 4x the size that everyone else owns and generally put out more carbon at a 100:1 ratio over your average citizen. What really, really melts them down is the loss of power. The loss of power over YOU, not saving the planet - trust me, there are far better ways to improve the well being of good old Earth than some shit for brains wealth redistribution treaty that the private jet crowd came up with.

I, of course, have an even better idea than this "accord." Get off your asses and do something about the extinction event called Fukushima which will kill everyone a lot sooner than some imaginary bullshit called climate change.

But, the good news is that we keep our sovereignty while telling the hapless EU President, Jean-Claude Juncker, "Screw you and your threats that we cannot just walk out of this and it takes 4 years." We are a sovereign nation and we voted for Trump, not like you where nobody in Europe voted for you, you were pushed on the people.

Just to point out how full of it and how much nitwittery is behind this plot, here's some quotes from the first "Earth Day."

“We have about five more years at the outside to do something.”
• Kenneth Watt, ecologist

“Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.”
• George Wald, Harvard Biologist

“We are in an environmental crisis which threatens the survival of this nation, and of the world as a suitable place of human habitation.”
• Barry Commoner, Washington University biologist

“Man must stop pollution and conserve his resources, not merely to enhance existence but to save the race from intolerable deterioration and possible extinction.”
• New York Times editorial, the day after the first Earth Day

“Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make. The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.”
• Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University biologist

“By…[1975] some experts feel that food shortages will have escalated the present level of world hunger and starvation into famines of unbelievable proportions. Other experts, more optimistic, think the ultimate food-population collision will not occur until the decade of the 1980s.”
• Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University biologist

“It is already too late to avoid mass starvation.”
• Denis Hayes, chief organizer for Earth Day

“Demographers agree almost unanimously on the following grim timetable: by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India; these will spread by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa. By the year 2000, or conceivably sooner, South and Central America will exist under famine conditions….By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine.”
• Peter Gunter, professor, North Texas State University

“Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence to support…the following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution…by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half….”
• Life Magazine, January 1970

“At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.”
• Kenneth Watt, Ecologist



Putin mistakes secret service for men in black. Smart, Vladimir, very smart. This can only mean one thing. Reptilian Overlords my friends, Reptilian Overlords.

I have already spoken to three US presidents. They come and go, but politics stays the same at all times. Do you know why? Because of the powerful bureaucracy. When a person is elected, they may have some ideas. Then people with briefcases arrive, well dressed, wearing dark suits, just like mine, except for the red tie, since they wear black or dark blue ones. These people start explaining how things are done. And instantly, everything changes. This is what happens with every administration.

Read more....


A bunch of science guys were able to snatch some DNA from Egyptian mummies and did their science magic. This is pretty cool from a sociological point of view because Egypt has a lot of extra information that can be used for study - a well documented history, interaction with surrounding populations, a developed language, extensive trading and of course aliens. Also, the techniques they developed to pull this off will allow for the study of other mummies from around the world, showing us a lot of information about ancient peoples, where they came from, who they descended from and of course aliens. They found that the ancient Egyptians weren't from Africa but the Levant, and were also closely related to Neolithic populations from the Anatolian Peninsula and Europe.

That's interesting enough but I wonder how the politically correct mindset will deal with this information.


The deep state operates with impunity and in the open if you know where to look and is a criminal society that should be referred to as 'Stato Profondo.'

There is a deep state (Stato Profondo) - unless you happen to be a hermit who has no communication with the outside world, you're probably aware of this by now since it's been made clear via the hatred of one Donald J. Trump and the various machinations and rumors hung around the neck of his administration in what appears to be a prolonged effort to derail any type of second term for this president. His supporters notwithstanding. This deep state reaches out via "leaks" and pundits, both willing dupes and useful idiots who are like a bumper crop on the farm of state. You could also call this deep state "The Establishment" wherein individuals and groups have become entrenched enough in the trough of swill and have become so bloated on the excesses of the government largess that they willingly take part in whatever Trump pinata is hung before them.

The deep state can also be seen and observed in other events from the Bundy Ranch standoff, Ruby Ridge as well as "mysterious" deaths like Michael Hastings.

With the right assistance, the deep state can be held at bay. The minions of this deep state are referred to with names like IRS, DHS, FBI, NSA and their ilk. With an excellent attorney and some social media magic, the light of day can be shone on those whom would do you and I no good.

But the individuals, the little separate employees of the deep state who go home at night to their nests and look after their hatchlings, they cannot physically reach out and do your person harm. Sure, they can file their paperwork to destroy your life. But they themselves cannot show up and put an ice-pick in your cranium, cannot cause a magical "accident" or the crowd favorite, the sudden heart failure.

But the state can. Not the departments, not the minions but "The state.”

The government, the deep state. Not just agents, or agencies, or departments, or the military. The United States of America.

Let me add some clarity for those not adept at the between the line shenanigans. Not the government you vote for, the one that delivers your mail, or builds your roads, or takes part of your paycheck.

I mean more than that. I mean the vast, sentient entity that is the deep state from sea to shining sea. The deep state that reads your e-mails. The deep state that listens to your phone calls. The deep state that decides whether you live or die. Whether or not you disappear from history. That deep state that exists so far above the law that it cannot break the law. It has detached itself from law, from morality, from what it is to be human.

That deep state which manifests the merest fraction of its power when it launches cruise missiles or grounds air traffic or keeps an "eye" on you. The deep state is watching you. It watches everyone, but it very particularly watches those it fears. It fears everyone, but some more than others. What about a man who does not cater to the deep state but instead seeks to destroy it by draining it's personal swamp? What about a man they can’t kill, or control, or even hurt without going nuclear? Would you fear someone like that if you were the deep state? Make no mistake. The moment the deep state fears it cannot control someone, they will lay plans to destroy this person utterly and totally, because they fear he would destroy them, those in the deep state.



In 1978, Car Craft magazine held it’s first national car show in Indianapolis. As part of the usual goodies, the first hundred entries got 4 laps at the Indianapolis Speedway. One of those lucky few was me. Driving around that speedway, passing over the yard of bricks, seeing those names on the pit wall, names like Andretti, Unser, Foyt was as near a life defining moment as one can have. Being able to actually drive on that surface that so many chased their dreams on is not something I shall ever forget. This is why, on this last Sunday in May, I not only pay my respect to the Military that makes my way of life possible, I discover all over again the closeness of the two twins of emotion – sorrow and joy.

Another one bites the dust

Add another soul to the pile of bodies, courtesy of the Deep State.

In other news, I'm pretty sure the gang of 3 - our mouse (princess Marie) and our cats (Queen Theodora Maxine Lourdes Spincter De'Catville and Prince Ambrose Butterbutt Spincter De'Catville) are plotting something. Nearly positive.


We're getting beyond nitwittery and moving into possible civil war / genocide / African hellhole territory. Plus, I am so damn glad my kid is long gone from college because if I had to put up with these shenanigans, there'd be hell to pay.

This country has worked it's ass off to stop racism, to accept people as people, yet these asswits want to reverse all of that by being racist themselves.

This is the single most disturbing campus story I have seen since this shitstorm started. It is worse than rioting. Worse than shout downs, because this teacher is being accused of racism. For existing. This is a mindset, a brainwash, a zombie state groupthink that is nothing less than a political cult and the adults that run these colleges are too busy doing something far more important than running their campus and doing their jobs. So, so sad.


Ten progressive judges in Virginia have decided that Muslims can ask judges to change the nation’s national security and immigration policies whenever prior campaign statements in democratic political elections can be described as unfair to Muslims living in America.


you know what really gets me pissed off? Having to run a ransomware/malware/virus scanner so tightly my computer just sits there while every file I try to open from applications to images is scanned to prevent losing everything I work so hard to create. These hackers are real assholes.

Let's look at what the deep state is doing along with their progressive friends using the internet and legacy media. They've managed to remove people, causing Fox News to be a shadow of itself. They've silenced voices like Sean Hannity who apparently folded like a house of cards. They have (according to popular theory) murdered Seth Rich, they harass, bloviate and slander the President of the United States, create faked and made up theories about Russia controlling our election using a fake dossier created to show Trump how fake dossiers are made. That alone is insanity at a level not seen since Stalin, Pol Pot or Idi Amin.

When we reduce this to a single observation, we have to realize that discerning what is fact and what is fiction is becoming harder and harder. Most people don't bother. Most people believe those whom they believe to be authoritative in their presentation and will thus believe lies and take innuendo as fact.

You may or not know about the properties of crystals. You might know they're used in watches (quartz) for accurate time keeping. What you probably don't know is that crystals can have repeating patterns and the patterns flow in a constant direction - you can't cut a crystal against it's grain or it'll blew up on you. That's what makes crystal skulls so odd - they're often made against the grain of the crystal.

There is also another state in crystals in which the patterns not only repeat physically but also in time which lets them maintain a constant state without energy usage.

Now some science dudes have created crystals that are man made that do exactly that - repeat across time.

Two separate research teams managed to create what looked an awful lot like time crystals back in January, and now both experiments have successfully passed peer-review for the first time, putting the 'impossible' phenomenon squarely in the realm of reality.

"We've taken these theoretical ideas that we've been poking around for the last couple of years and actually built it in the laboratory," says one of the researchers, Andrew Potter from Texas University at Austin.

"Hopefully, this is just the first example of these, with many more to come."

Time crystals are one of the coolest things physics has dished up in recent months, because they point to a whole new world of 'non-equilibrium' phases that are entirely different from anything scientists have studied in the past.

For decades, we've been studying matter, such as metals and insulators, that's defined as being 'in equilibrium' - a state where all the atoms in a material have the same amount of heat.

Now it looks like time crystals are the first example of the hypothesized but unstudied 'non-equilibrium' state of matter, and they could revolutionize how we store and transfer information via quantum systems.

"It shows that the richness of the phases of matter is even broader [than we thought]," physicist Norman Yao from the University of California, Berkeley, who published the blueprint in January, told Gizmodo.

Read more....

Which means that the John Titor / Bill Xam / AltRightNation time machine is about to be tested for the first time. But you'll never know due to the time paradoxes I'm planning on making.


I thought I had finished with my deep state series but good 'ol John Podesta went and sucked me right back in. The pointy headed son of a bitch is now whirling like a demented ballerina yapping about Russian collusion like some sort of mentally deficient dimwit that has somehow achieved political power. Sort of like Maxine Waters.

Well, Podesta seems to think that we're colluding with the Russians. As yet, I haven't gotten paid if that's the case. Maybe he could have Hillary contact her friends in Russia about this. Thanks John.

The nitwittery continues without pause. The next victim on their hit parade is Sean Hannity wherein John Podesta is now pissing and moaning and whining and crying that Hannity is colluding with the Russians, not to mention every alt-right person (someday I'm going to have to figure out if the alt-right is a membership, mindset or philosophy). The interesting part is that it would also by hysterically funny if it wasn't for the fact that they're destroying lives. Podesta is using false accusations about fake news to destroy people. In other words using fake news to create fake news in order to achieve the fake accusations using fake news accusations. It's brilliant in it's simplicity because the kool aid drinkers will swallow it hook line and sinker. After all, it's the seriousness of the charge, not whether or not it's true.

Apparently, their thinking is that since they lost power at the federal, state and local levels, the only way to crack down and silence voices is to use false charges, innuendo and put pressure on media venues to remove conservative voices. If we plug this into the deep state formula that I'm trying to create, then this phase of the coup/revolution/civil war is to get rid of as many conservative, non-establishment voices as possible. Remember, they have been trying without success to destroy Limbaugh for years and years. Apparently, they've decided to go after the low hanging fruit on the tree of freedom first by destroying the conservative voice community.

The bottom line is that the deep state is using delusions to create a false reality and using twisted logic to create a Soviet like state in social and legacy media, using the pressure created by the delusions to destroy legitimate voices and lives.


The deep state operates with impunity and in the open if you know where to look and is a criminal society that should be referred to as 'Stato Profondo.'

Let's go for a walk. The deep state (Stato Profondo) won't mind so don't worry about those guys for a minute. This is the third part about the deep state (Stato Profondo) and my efforts to understand what's going on.

This walk we're going on is to stride beside all of the Democrats that are walking back the impeachment talk. Why? Why are they doing that. It's their dream. Humiliate the president, kick him out of office, tear him asunder, throw him under the bus and then a tank. Yet, they're muttering about "no impeachment." Funny thing is they've whipped up their supporters into a frenzy of nitwittery, bordering on violence. There is a reason for all of this and it goes right back to the deep state (Stato Profondo) and will help you identify the players and the non-players. One has to assume that eventually someone is going to snap and then it will cascade into acts of violence all over the place and maybe (remote possibility) a civil war over the constitutional republic. This is why Maxine Waters is being touted as a hero to these people. When someone who obviously has an elevator not going to the top floor and is a few fries short of a happy meal is elevated into hero and role model status, it becomes obvious that someone is trying to take crazy comments and turn them into actual physical acts.

It's all pretty simple. The ones that are saying there's going to be an impeachment of Donald Trump are not, repeat, not members of the deep state (Stato Profondo) or are nothing more than useful tools for them. The people in the deep state (Stato Profondo) know full well there is virtually no evidence to pin on Trump to get him out of office. None. The whole forcing him out of office meme is dead in the water and there's a reason for that too. All of the efforts of the deep state (Stato Profondo) are to make the Trump presidency useless and wallow in a morass of failure. The deep state (Stato Profondo) needs to make Trump irrelevant otherwise someone like him is going to come along and continue his good work. Otherwise Trump may dismantle their criminal society. This is like the mafia versus the FBI. Like the drug lords versus the government in Central America. People do die for the cause and because of it. The cause of control of society is what they exist for, what they desire. Forget communism, socialism - the platform they use is meaningless in this context. It's the end result or what they seek to achieve in the end that's important to my understanding of the deep state (Stato Profondo) which is control of society.

The deep state (Stato Profondo), in my opinion, has one paramount rule: to continue to exist. If the deep state (Stato Profondo) is destroyed, they will no longer be able to exert control over the people or the newly elected in Washington which of course would lead to it's own end as well as the end of the establishment and everything that goes with it. And thus it boils down to two things - control of society and the greed of money.


I'm inventing words. My latest one is "nitwittery." Best part about this one is needs no explanation. Nitwittery. And I'm going to use it right now.

In the latest display of the nitwittery that has taken over society as a whole, a scientific paper detailing one of the causes of climate change being the much maligned, often misunderstood and most certainly underused male appendage which goes by many names and has gained a new one. "Destroyer of Worlds." That's right, a man's pee pee is now killing the planet.

Yeah, that's funny all right. It makes no sense and it shouldn't because it's fake. 100%. But the people that wrote the fictional climate change cause wanted to prove how off kilter and taken over by the deep state (Stato Profondo) the scientific community is when it comes to their communist tour de` force, climate change. The entire science community is not at all engaging in nitwittery. Only those who are using science to advance the premise that you and I need to be controlled, that we are the destroyer of worlds. That despite the fact that in the beginning we were told to "go forth and multiply" by the guy in charge (and that's another topic for another day, the destruction of our national identity), we're now controlled in our multiplying simply because some idiot at some point came up with the bright idea that if they couldn't get rid of the constitution and our way of life, then dammit they'd have to invent a way to do it. Consider the number of people around the world who use and have used fire to cook food. From cow chips to wood, the under and undeveloped world uses burnable materials to survive. China spews a ton of shit into the air 24/7/365. Volcanoes blow their tops, adding their mess to the air. The sun heats the planet and rain cools it. And despite all of that, we're told that the car we drive our our BBQ or even our toilets are killing the planet. It is in fact nothing more than a way to control us through the deep state - which in this case operates right out in the open for everyone to see. We're told the gasses that we exude are killing the planet, despite the much higher levels of the very same gasses during an ice age.

The deep state (stato profondo) seeks to control us. And we're letting it.

We intended to test the hypothesis that flattery of the academic Left’s moral architecture in general, and of the moral orthodoxy in gender studies in particular, is the overwhelming determiner of publication in an academic journal in the field. That is, we sought to demonstrate that a desire for a certain moral view of the world to be validated could overcome the critical assessment required for legitimate scholarship. Particularly, we suspected that gender studies is crippled academically by an overriding almost-religious belief that maleness is the root of all evil. On the evidence, our suspicion was justified.

They also took care to make it completely incomprehensible.

We didn’t try to make the paper coherent; instead, we stuffed it full of jargon (like “discursive” and “isomorphism”), nonsense (like arguing that hypermasculine men are both inside and outside of certain discourses at the same time), red-flag phrases (like “pre-post-patriarchal society”), lewd references to slang terms for the penis, insulting phrasing regarding men (including referring to some men who choose not to have children as being “unable to coerce a mate”), and allusions to rape (we stated that “manspreading,” a complaint levied against men for sitting with their legs spread wide, is “akin to raping the empty space around him”). After completing the paper, we read it carefully to ensure it didn’t say anything meaningful, and as neither one of us could determine what it is actually about, we deemed it a success.

Read more....


Day two of trying to make heads or tails of this deep state thing with all of it's related baggage from attempts to foist a coup to mysterious deaths to false allegations designed to throw the country into a completely fictious and manufactured crisis. This isn't an easy task - first you can't interview the head of the deep state (Stato Profondo) or any of his minions. You can't call the deep state (Stato Profondo) for a comment. You can't post photos of the deep state, only their "crew" leaders. The mafia doesn't do interviews and neither does the deep state (Stato Profondo). The so called deep state (Stato Profondo) operates with impunity, without any oversight and in the open, yet nobody does anything about it. However, it's much more than that. A lot of pundits and commentators have tried to define the deep state (Stato Profondo). We know that the members of this criminal society have a few behaviors in common:

1 - They don't need marching orders. They know that overthrowing Donald Trump is job number one.

2 - They aren't faceless. They are the leftovers from Clinton/Bush/Obama that are establishment members.

3 - They have no problem ignoring instructions from their boss, one President Trump.

4 - They have infiltrated the judicial system, the educational system, and representation systems from the city/township/village level up to Congress.

5 - The media is part of the deep state. It has been suggested that the media is actually the head of the deep state, however I have my doubts about that. The members of the media are far too stupid to achieve such a lofty success ratio.

6 - (I have my doubts but am adding this for giggles)The relationship between the deep state and either the Muslim Brotherhood or radical Muslims go hand in hand to overthrow our government as it exists. I'm not buying this 100% unless someone can explain how the deep state transgender bullshit can co-exist with the brotherhood or radicals.

What we face on a day to day basis is the general public getting information that is boiled down to the point where they cannot find the truth and are many times unable to even find the truth on their own because they are more and more satisfied with the deception and propaganda that have determines their convictions for them. They are becoming more and more satisfied with a fictitious reality created by design through the abuse of language and information, taken out of context using the same methods that the Soviets used during their reign of terror. It could be argued that the deep state (Stato Profondo) is an operation of and by the media rather than the reverse.

The media and deep state (Stato Profondo) use their daily narrative of taking the truth, and then put it through the in latest kitchen appliance technology, the truthchopper 6000 which takes facts and factual events and chops, dices and purees information to a nutritious drink of ice cold propaganda in your choice of flavors, communistic or socialtastic but only comes in one color: red.

All jokes aside, we've seen over the past week before writing this, that apparently, the former director of the FBI, Mr. Comey, kept notes in the form of memos to himself, which is odd enough, but as yet has not produced these memos which is good because that would probably be against the law. Mark Levin has come up with some questions he'd like to see asked of Mr. Comey. At least Comey's not a fruit loop like Hoover was. I think.

Here's another handy link on this and related subjects regarding the deep state (Stato Profondo):

CNN's crush on Trump leads to obsession.

Doug Giles over at has an interesting note concerning CNNs coverage of the's a felony.

18 U.S. Code § 1038 – False information and hoaxes

(a) Criminal Violation.— (1)In general.—Whoever engages in any conduct with intent to convey false or misleading information under circumstances where such information may reasonably be believed and where such information indicates that an activity has taken, is taking, or will take place that would constitute a violation of chapter 2, 10, 11B, 39, 40, 44, 111, or 113B of this title, section 236 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2284), or section 46502, the second sentence of section 46504, section 46505(b)(3) or (c), section 46506 if homicide or attempted homicide is involved, or section 60123(b) of title 49, shall—

(A) be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;

(B) if serious bodily injury results, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and

(C) if death results, be fined under this title or imprisoned for any number of years up to life, or both.

(2)Armed forces.—Any person who makes a false statement, with intent to convey false or misleading information, about the death, injury, capture, or disappearance of a member of the Armed Forces of the United States during a war or armed conflict in which the United States is engaged—

(A) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;

(B) if serious bodily injury results, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and

(C) if death results, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for any number of years or for life, or both.

(b)Civil Action.—

Whoever engages in any conduct with intent to convey false or misleading information under circumstances where such information may reasonably be believed and where such information indicates that an activity has taken, is taking, or will take place that would constitute a violation of chapter 2, 10, 11B, 39, 40, 44, 111, or 113B of this title, section 236 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2284), or section 46502, the second sentence of section 46504, section 46505 (b)(3) or (c), section 46506 if homicide or attempted homicide is involved, or section 60123(b) of title 49 is liable in a civil action to any party incurring expenses incident to any emergency or investigative response to that conduct, for those expenses.

(c) Reimbursement.—

(1)In general.—

The court, in imposing a sentence on a defendant who has been convicted of an offense under subsection (a), shall order the defendant to reimburse any state or local government, or private not-for-profit organization that provides fire or rescue service incurring expenses incident to any emergency or investigative response to that conduct, for those expenses.


A person ordered to make reimbursement under this subsection shall be jointly and severally liable for such expenses with each other person, if any, who is ordered to make reimbursement under this subsection for the same expenses.

(3)Civil judgment.—

An order of reimbursement under this subsection shall, for the purposes of enforcement, be treated as a civil judgment.

(d)Activities of Law Enforcement.— This section does not prohibit any lawfully authorized investigative, protective, or intelligence activity of a law enforcement agency of the United States, a State, or political subdivision of a State, or of an intelligence agency of the United States. (Added Pub. L. 108–458, title VI, § 6702 (a), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3764.)


This is the first Daily Thought that I'm writing on the road with only a Bluetooth keyboard which really sucks. I think that we have a real problem that I'm trying to sort out before really reaching any conclusions. The issue with the so called "deep state" is that they are operating with impunity, without any oversight and virtually no controlling organizing body like congressional oversight committees. This creates a dangerous condition where if the deep state personnel need you to vanish or otherwise be eliminated (see Weiner or Rich) there won't be any questions about it. How many times over the past few years have we heard about so-and-so who was about to testify suddenly be the victim of a random mugging, heart attack or accident?

Once Trump won the election, we could have believed that the worst was over and the destructive, extra-constitutional rules, regulations and laws would have begun to slip into the dark night of history but the opposite (in some cases) is true.

This is especially disturbing to someone like myself who at any given time could make the tragic mistake of telling too much of the truth and wind up having a tragic one car accident while sleeping in bed.

As I say, this needs to be carefully thought out before wading into the shitstorm that is the deep state. Welcome to explodapalusa.


The Chinese claim to have managed to obtain flammable gas - methane. The claim is that they got some 16,000 cubic feet per day.So this chick in Texas wants to regulate fapping. Honest to God, a $100 fine.

Did you know.....President Trump was born on Flag Day, June 14.

Have the leftist/socialist/communist/liberation theology Democrats decended into tribalism? If so, the next step that "proceed" to would be armed civil war. Tribalism always ends that way.


The nitwits are in full nitwitian mode suggesting that Trump just resign. I have a counter offer: How about the liberals shut the fuck up, twinkletoe their faggot asses back to their safe spaces and in turn we let them live out their sad Tofu, hybrid, cross dressing latte lives.

The terms special council, special prosecutor, independent investigator are all the same thing.  What they are called has to do with what they are being used for in the private sector. In politics however what they are called simply depends on the spin that speaker/shill/mouthpiece is trying to put on their statement. If they want it to sound ominous they will say special prosecutor. If they want to soften the way this persons title sounds they will typically say special council. And then of course they utterly destroy their personal and professional lives. Unless of course they're investigating a Republican in which case they're treated as if they are an angel from on high, sent to Earth by the Lord God Almighty himself.

The best part is that if this play out as everything else has, there will be no evidence found (unless it's made up) and the butt hurt humiliation will have everyone walking funny for a month.

The Marxist nutbags have been triggered by their smart televisions and the bleating sheep have begun their long march to the clif by the sea, led by the pied piper of the media collusion machine.

John McCain tottered into the limelight once again to tout the virtues of fake news and how much he likes it, because without fake news he wouldn't have the chance to say "Watergate" over and over again like he's reciting his personal evil Rosary.


You know what we should do is just go ahead and do an honorary impeachment of each cheating, unelected, nasty, horrible, asshole, idiot, twit, dufus, crooked Republican president before he takes office in order to save time because Chuck Shumer is a very busy man. Likewise, we need to create a monument on the mall in Washington and put a statue of any Democrat president that we can rotate every year or so that when the Democrats argue over who's statue should be there, they can blame it on a Republican plot because everyone knows that the Republicans plot and the Democrats are never caught.


Add another body to the pile.

Watching the human condition is always entertaining. What goes around comes around, history repeats itself and of course "the kids these days...." To which I give you the university that has hired a security force to enforce their views. Sponsored by the "Mao Zedong Camp For Re-education" Sometimes it really is hard to believe that we're letting this happen. At some point we're gonna wake up and find out they slipped that "K" into America.

So, we have official jobs at a University to enforce leftest blasphemy rules now? When can we drive one sided biased politics out of our education system? Is that too much to ask.

Who died and made these Social Justice jackasses the thought police? Seriously? And with taxpayer money to boot?

Read more....

A poll done by the "Public Religion Research Institute" and the Atlantic says that nearly 48 percent of white working class people feel like a stranger in their own country. Perhaps the Mandela effect is more pervasive than first thought.

Meanwhile, Democrats are pissing and moaning that they lost 300,000 votes because of voter ID laws in Wisconsin. The usual Democrat dead people voting joke here. Or if you like illegal alien voting joke. Your choice.


Is today going to be a "Black Monday" from the wannacry ransomware? You can bet the tards, unless it affects them directly will snicker that anyone worried about it. Meanwhile, Trump will take the blame. Meanwhile, Julian Assange says "nobody listened to me."

Here's one you forgot about. Bill Clinton fired the FBI director one day before Vince Foster was found dead.

Microsoft's chief legal guy jumped on board the AltRightNation train and said that the government should report weaknesses they discover to software companies rather than seek to exploit them. Alternativly, software companies shouldn't produce software that has holes in it. Of course neither are white hats.

Axios has a pretty darned good doomtard article about how the energy industry doesn't want Trump to de-regulate them. Turns out they like being put out of business.

Like homeowner and condominium associations, there is a place where your constitutional rights don't exist.


The whole point of the Wannacry issue isn't that the worst ransomware attack in history is hitting ATM machines, hospitals, corporations and individuals. The real issue is that it was thought up by a government agency and nobody is addressing that.. That's the real problem.

Here's the deal - it's like these people are taking a shit and staring into the toilet and then astral gazed in the toilet to create their next "big" idea..

Bonus Thought of The Day

After six decades, I've made it my business, for my survival, to understand how people think, act and work. Countless times, that unerstanding has not only saved some black eyes and broken bones but also holes in my skin via firearms. I understand humanity. I understand our baser, uglier nature, the way fear can rob humans at an individual level  of reason and send them rushing over the cliff like lemmings. Look around the world and you have proof enough of that, from the insanity of the middle east to the street wars in Chicago that everyone seems to ignore unless it's their kin lying dead in the streets. The violence that lies under our thin veneer of civilization is a constant brew of hormones and blind emotion.

But also realize that if led well, with some wisdom and just a modicum of courage, a frightened horde could rise above itself and act with outward calm and grace that completely belies any inward turmoil. But they have to be led. This is what is happening. The unreasoning, the poorly educated, primed in their educational experience by the former drug addled freaks of the 1960's, are usually a single feigned outrage from violence, the easiest generation in many previous to whip up into the French revolution style of overthrow of a duly elected government.


Two years ago, my wife got hit by a ransomware attack, probably from willy nilly clicking on email links. As you already know, there is a worldwide ransomware attack going on that leverages Windows systems and locks them down with ransomware. From hospital systems to railway controls, the attack is supposed to be using NSA tools that were leaked. I've read a lot of articles this morning about the attack and defending against it (helpfully, Microsoft links to download the patch are all "403 not found" which isn't surprising in the least.

The infection usually starts with willy nilly link clicking so don't do it. In fact, take your computer off the internet and just sit there. Damned ransomware.

But nobody is talking about the most important aspect of this. It's an NSA tool, as in government spying on computers. That's the real story - that the NSA could get into millions and millions of computers at will.


There's so much willy nilly crap going on right now (again) that it's hard to keep track of whirling, spinning hydra heads popping out of the Democrats and the media. But like an idiot, I'm going to try.

First, I'm going to echo what other media giants have been muttering into their microphones over the past 72 hours:

Advice to Trump - get rid of your "advisors" and choose the next ones a little better, stop watching the news, stop being distracted and for God's sake stop with the spectacle. We put you there to stop the shenanigans not enable them. Thank you.

Sincerely, Deplorable Bill Xam and 200 million friends

Democrats want Republicans to voluntarily destroy their party by siding with Democrats to conduct a coup against the guy who won their party nomination.

They want to appoint the new FBI Director. They want a Special Prosecutor. Just like they got their budget through and Republicans caved (oh but the next one, we're reaaaaally gonna stick it to them!). Just like Republicans caved on repealing Obamacare. Democrats are the minority, but they get what they want. This is how a communist takeover works once you examine the mechanics of how it happens and how a country will willingly allow itself to be dragged into Satan's pit of despair.

The Democrats sure have a lot of say so for a minority party that has been completely rejected at the federal, local and State levels.

Since they are the progressive/communist/socialist/liberation theology/snowflake/nutcase sect of American politics, there will be pissing, moaning, wailing, feigned indignance and all forms of human lamentations. Rivers of tears will flow, throats will bleed from uncontrolled screaming.

But as always, Republicans will cave and will stab each other in the back. They think that once Trump is gone things will go back to normal and that we will vote for them again because we have no choice, like always. The Stockholm syndrome is in full effect.

I wonder if anyone else has tried to work out a timeline of all of this bullshit (what I like to call "what the hell is happening to this country timeline") that's going down now from the Russian propaganda to the fake Comey outrage propaganda to the media propaganda to the snide commentary in every newscast and or report, either written, spoken or injected directly into our brains via our Samsung televisions propaganda is both enraging and entertaining to watch. I tried and it turned into a spiderweb of intersecting lines that looked like some kind of 90 year old former rock n roll superstar's face after a night of coke and chicks.

By now, you all have noticed that the media is now the official mouthpiece (or vise versa as some are speculating) of the the progressive/communist/socialist/liberation theology/snowflake/nutcase sect of American politics, which in my opinion only started when the ban on propaganda conveniently called "Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act" was lifted, which was signed by none other than the head of the revolution in America, Barack Obama, back in December as one of Obama's last cleanup efforts to cement his ability to destroy the presidency of Donald Trump. This is the fountain from which the rich chocolate bullshit spews from in the media and any political crackhead presser via the "deep state" which is still doing the bidding of the Kenyan refugee in chief, Barack Obama, who appears intent on overthrowing the duly elected government of the United States of America. Said duly elected government, if it had either any guts or balls, would eliminate the threat into a 10 x 10 room in Leavenworth for the duration.

Another greatest hit on the "what the hell is happening to this country timeline" was the expansion of surveillance powers just before Obama was booted out of his lifelong White House.

If you take just those two items and take the time to realize that more than any other modern president, Obama politically weaponized the IRS, FBI, DOJ, EPA, DHS and any other department under his power to do his bidding from destroying industries, ignoring obvious crimes to allowing illegal aliens into the country to denying opposing viewpoints any tax benefits to an entire rainbow of efforts you'll realize the bevy of deep state agents of "hope and change" that are still entrenched in the various government agencies are still to this day doing his dirty work.

One would be correct in assuming that if (and perhaps when) an event or series of events transpire that they would help to overturn the duly elected government of the United States based not on constitutional or legal grounds but based on an ideological framework designed to turn the United States into a "workers paradise" much like the Soviet Union.

And that friends explains why the progressive/communist/socialist/liberation theology/snowflake/nutcase sect of American politics is so manic about the so called "Russian interference" in the election - they don't like competition.


I've told you how laws are made - a Democrat gets up and shouts "I gotta great idea for a crappy law!" and the Republican gets up and shouts back "And I can make it even WORSE!"

Well, let me tell you about witch hunts. Back when witches were being dragged out of the woodwork, they'd throw you into a lake and if you drowned, you weren't a witch (but dead) and if you floated, you were a witch and thus killed.

And that's how FBI investigations work when it's a Republican being investigated. 


Politico has a piece about the Comey firing - you can't miss a Drudge headline - which claims that Trump went into a screaming rage over the Russia thing. I'm calling bullshit.

Here is my personal opinion. The testimony last week made the decision for Trump. And believe me, when all the Google results for "Comey congress testimony" returns Snopes, NYT, WaPo, Elizabeth Warren and CNN as the top sources which "clarify", the fish, it stinks.

Trump gave Comey enough time to show his lack of evidence, proving Comey had nothing to substantiate his investigation into the "Russia ties" conspiracy theory. Comey had 6 months to prove he had even a shred of evidence. He had nothing, and he couldn't even give a straight answer under oath in congressional hearings. At the end of the day, Comey wasted millions in taxpayer resources on his partisan wild-goose chase, and caused a massive loss of public trust in the FBI. Firing him was the right decision.

If you all are still wondering why Trump says things at certain times, you need to learn about the man.

The left is crooked and dumb. For decades they have relied on two different things combined to push their agenda and corruption forward: The Sleeping Masses and Establishment Politicians

A. But the playing field has changed you have a population (outside the far left) that is waking up and doing some critic thinking when it comes to their government. A chain reaction is happening on the right.

Folks on the right who did not follow politics at all are now casual followers. Folks on the right who were casual followers are now becoming Savy Followers Folks on the right who were Savy followers are now becoming very in depth followers.

There's only one problem: The Globalist elites were not expecting this.

B.The establishment politicians are losing their stranglehold on DC. The last person to shake up Washington DC before Donald Trump was also an Actor. His name was Ronald Reagan. The Establishment hated the man. But folks began to wake up before being put back to sleep by a Globalist and a Saxophone Player.

We are now seeing non establishment picks being elected in Congress and really for the first time we have seen a pure outsider be elected to the Presidency. The left was not expecting this.

The Russian allegations were intended to destroy Trumps chances at the Presidency. After Trump won the presidency, Obama was trying to cover his tracks by implementing a new wiretap law. But the wrongdoing was already done. The information was classified but that does no good when the guy you classified it against is now sitting in the Oval Office instead of the person you were doing it for.

The Democratic Party is in complete damage control mode led by their cronies in the mainstream media. Trying to brainwash the middle to follow them into the political battlefield.

When Trump made these allegations against Obama he knew that the release of the healthcare bill was just around the corner. He knew he was going to take major heat from the leftist media. How could he not? He's been fighting them since he entered the political arena. This was precisely timed by President Trump.

If you have also noticed in the media they stated that Trump has not talked directly to James Comey. What possible reason could there be for this? Simple. Why would you talk about unlawful happenings to the very person who was in on it?

This has frustrated Comey. He has once again stuck his foot in his mouth. It is on good authority that Hillary, Lynch and Comey are all three involved with this as well.

Obama has not come directly forward either. He has had a spokesman do it for him. So when the time comes that there was a lie told, He can blame it on the spokesman that he “misspoke”.


Daniel Greenfield has written another amazing piece wherein he compares the attempted takeover of all western societies by Muslims to the Nigerian prince email scams.....and the government fell for it, hook, line and sinker.

The French give up again.


This is an example of how things on the internet are not always as they seem.

All of this is old news; the judge is retired and charged with corruption. But you may see several articles about this case that paint it in a rather false light.

So there's this guy who figured out how to exploit a weakness in the domain name registration arena in the late 1990s, using a script to register hundreds of thousands of domain names and then was able to derive a profit from traffic that went to them. 1.5 million dollars a month.  He got snookered by another guy who said he could make a super search engine and really rake in the cash. They had an argument and many lawsuits were filed resulting in a federal judge placing the first guy who got snookered into receivership which hasn't been done since the late 1800s and seized virtually everything he owned. The 5th circuit ruled in November of last year that that was wrong, wrong, wrong. The 5th circuit said the original judge had an "array of recourses" that he could apply but what he actually did was not one of them.


Here is what this article is about, section 702 of the FISA amendments act that expires this year. What we know now about what Obama was doing during the campaign leading up to the 2016 election should damn the entire FISA procedures, courts and anything associated with them and anyone involved that submitted to the illegal exposure of American citizens should have either grabbed their whistle and started blowing or resigned on the spot. Nobody did or has that we know of. That alone should tell us that this law should be stricken from the books and the people in charge or doing the surveillance should be removed forthwith.

From the act:

These procedures require that the acquisition of information is conducted, to the greatest extent reasonably feasible, to minimize the acquisition of information not relevant to the authorized foreign intelligence purpose.

Any inadvertently acquired communication of or concerning a U.S. person must be promptly destroyed if it is neither relevant to the authorized purpose nor evidence of a crime.

If a target who was reasonably believed to be a non-U.S. person outside of the U.S. either enters the U.S. or was in fact a U.S. person at the time of acquisition, targeting must be immediately terminated.

Read more....And more.... And even more!

Fight over warrantless surveillance? Really? This particular blood pressure raising session is about the FISA Amendments Act, which is set to expire at the end of 2017 and more importantly section 702 of that act. F.B.I. director Comey says this about it:

This is a tool that is essential to the safety of this country. I did not say the same thing about the collection of telephone dialing information by the N.S.A.. I think that’s a useful tool; (section) 702 is an essential tool, and if it goes away, we’ll be less safe as a country. And I mean that.

Yeah, I know Comey can't be trusted in the first place but that's beside the point.

Why would we be less safe?

Because the brainwashed progressive victims are turning violent?

Or is it because someone let thousands upon thousands of wanna be terrorist "refugees" in the country?

Or could it be the open southern border?

Why exactly are we not safe and why exactly do we need your continued spying?

This is one of the things that enrages me. It's still business as usual in the swamp, the same suspects doing the same crimes and getting away with it. Rather than firing or demanding a resignation or even getting the pump to the swamp to drain it, we haven't even got the EPA swamp draining paperwork filled out.

Hey! Maybe that's it! Trump was all set to drain the swamp and the EPA wouldn't give him a permit to do it! Now it's all making sense.

Does political correctness equal staying silent? Does political correctness mean not defending the very concept of your country? Does it mean not speaking out when you know something is wrong? We can wander around your local Wal-Mart and ask these questions all day long and you'll get a 50-50 split on opinions or close enough to it to render the differences moot. What matters is not how we feel about it - feelings don't govern society, laws do. We have our own laws, based on the 10 commandments because the country was founded by Christians who apparently took it fairly seriously. I'm sure that half of you reading this just screamed at your computer about slaves, bunch of old white men; the usual bullshit that passes for knowledge these days but the simple fact remains that our founding documents eclipse even the Magna Carta in their importance to human civilization. Even Atlantis didn't have that.

Those of us not in the mental stupor from educational system and it's brainwashing know full well that we are a Judeo-Christian based society and have no wish to change that. I kinda like it myself. Over the years, I've interviewed many people that have issued warnings about Satan worshipers and others that seek to destroy our system of checks and balances, our laws and credos that we (for the most part) live by.

After all, the typical features are all on display – the Muslim call to prayer, the teaching of Islam in the nation’s schools to the exclusion of other religions, preferential treatment afforded Muslims by government and the courts, news coverage reflexively portraying Islam in a positive light, the rapid growth in mosque construction – and also the disturbing cultural phenomena of female genital mutilation, “honor killings” and so on.

Except this is not Saudi Arabia or Egypt we’re talking about, or any of the world’s approximately 50 Muslim-majority countries.

This is the United States of America. Not America as it might be one day if current trends continue, but as it is right now – today.

That’s right. While North Korea threatens to nuke the U.S. mainland, while the left continues its infantile post-election meltdown into madness, while President Trump endeavors to remedy the torrent of national and international problems unleashed by his predecessor Barack Obama – beneath the radar and largely out of view, America is inexorably becoming ever more Islamized.

Read more....

Sadly, WND is about 9 years too late to the discussion. People have been discussing this for far longer than the current invasion of Europe or the Americas.

One comment I read went like this:

Stopping Muslims from coming into the country only solves half the problem. The ones that are already here must be deported, or else their 'Civilization Jihad' will continue on until they destroy us.

If we ascribe to the outlawing a single "religion" then we're on a slippery slope which in the end could silence church bells on Sunday mornings once certain mindsets return to the executive branch. That said, a "religion" that openly practices mutilation, beheadings, whippings, rape, burning, crucifixions and the like would have to be given a choice which would be renounce those practices publicly to be part of a western society or be shown the door either walking or otherwise. There isn't a place in our society wherein one has to choose a certain belief in order to remain living which is a pretty simple concept to grasp.

There are those that will point out we also have the satanists that practice their "religion" which I find no different than the one that this thread discusses given the practices in the name of Satan. When we find examples and evidence of practices that harm individuals in the name of Satanism we arrest and prosecute, do we not? How would another religion that practices mutilation, beheadings, whippings, rape, burning, crucifixions be treated any differently? Would it be through intimidation? Withholding of fossil fuels? Blackmail? Or political correctness brought about by a misplaced need to be apologists?  Even so, a renouncing wouldn't solve the problems because of Taqiyya, which is lying to non-believers which is okay which is where the slope gets really slippery because if we cannot believe public statements, then how can one select them as any sort of representative of the community with the demonstrable proof at hand that lying is acceptable? We already have plenty of that from their apologists. Which now becomes taxation without representation. Not to mention court proceedings, jury of peers and whatnot. In short and without any nod to any sort of correctness, there are certain sects of society that can't and shouldn't be trusted in western Judaeo- Christian society. Consider the aspect of the opposite wherein Christians would be "refugees" and begn migrating to Muslim countries and taking over. It wouldn't exactly go over real big because their governments would but the kabash on that real quick which is exactly what should have happened in this country many years ago. The exact cause can be debated long and hard but one has to only look in one direction to find who has the responsibility to keep what we consider undesirable persons from entering the country, legally or illegally which brings me to my final point in this article: We're on our last chance to turn this society around or the next stop is going to be the danger zone of moral and spiritual degradation. All this of course will fall on the selectively deaf ears of leaders.



The head socialistic leader of the disenfranchised, Barack Obama is reported to be sad about Donald Trump and how he's managed to help the country. The Daily Caller says ... Obama’s feelings about Trump in the White House as “like watching a business he’d built for eight years being slowly ripped down.” Apparently he forgot "he didn't build that" part of the deal. Not to mention he's never had an honest job in his entire life.

At this point I'm comfortable knowing that Obama's legacy is on par with that of a comic book character. You could be forgiven if you didn't care what Obama thinks at this point. I believe that knowing what he thinks and does at this point of his life is in fact important. Remember, he's a community organizer and heads the deep state machine embedded in the government. He's at the forefront of the movement that you could call the "anti-America" movement which thinks that America isn't all that. At some point his cronies will regain the power over the executive branch which is when we'll all see the vindictive nature of their kind.


It occurs to me the difference between Communist Democrats tm and normal people is that the Communist Democrats tm have no internal throttle, nothing to guide them, no internal voice advising them, a mind devoid of any sort of moral compass, instead of analyzing of their own motives to self govern how they communicate with the world around them.

The latest news from around America is that Nabisco has changed the Oreo cookie formula, laying waste to the happy thoughts and milk dunking of millions of people around the world. The cookies now taste chalky and cheap and people eating them have reported the sudden urge to don an orange wig and watch Alec Baldwin skits. Many Oreos fans have reported that they've also been abducted by the reptilian overlords while watching repeats of "The West Wing" and have suddenly started speaking Spanish.

Well, well, well. It's not law yet, it hasn't been signed by the president and it still has to survive the media and Communist Democrat onslaught of dead children, starving elderly and dog kicking descriptive prose only the truly insane can accomplish. The Republicans finally passed the "repeal" of Obamacare tm that we all haven't been waiting for and I must say this is the repeal and replace that we all haven't been anticipating simply because, let's face it, government is still involved in our healthcare lording their bullshit lobbyist ideas over us all. With great fanfare as well as pomp and circumstance right after the vote, the entire pack of Republicans boarded some buses while the Democrats were still warming up their doom and gloom 50 year old playbook anecdotes. After a quick happy hour stop at the Trump International Hotel Washington, D.C for some adult beverages, were met at the White House by the Marine marching band, 5 F-35 jets hovering over the White House with confetti blasting out of their jet engines along with 200 fire engines lining the street and driveway, spraying red, white and blue colored water over the bus procession as it approached the White House where Donald Trump waiting on a pair of 7 foot tall stilts upon which he was dancing in a display that hasn't been seen in Washington since Nancy Pelosi carried around her giant gavel during the original Obamacare tm vote. Later, a pinata of Nancy Pelosi was unveiled for the enjoyment of the children in attendance, who according to Pelosi, were going to die if the bill was passed by the house.

Read more....


Clarity: Limbaugh says his issues with budget has nothing to do with conservatives.

How many times during the campaign did I warn everybody Trump is not a conservative? Multiple times a day. How many times a day did I tell people that Donald Trump is not even ideological? Multiple times a day. How many times have I told you, do not expect Trump to be a conservative; he isn’t one. Why did I change the name of my think tank from the Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies to the Institute for Advanced Anti-Leftist Studies?

Read more....

The fact and the question remains: Why bother voting Republicans if this is the result?

The more I learn about this, the more amazed I am that he willingly left office.


As recent events, such as the hospitalization of a professor at Charles Murray's recent speech at Middlebury College have shown, intimidation and violence are clearly regarded by today's North American students as legitimate means to stop people from speaking.


Sometimes I wonder if I'm expecting too much from the people that I voted for. Sure, they expect me to be happy to be forced to do the things they want, you know, for my own good, for the children. Sure they promise one thing and do another but, just like me they're flawed human beings, doing their best to get along. But then I realize that they got to Washington as a citizen and come out the other end very rich and taken care of for the rest of their lives. Meanwhile in anytown, U.S.A. we live with the debris of their hubris and the whispering voices of the lobbyists.

Limbaugh had the vice president (of the United States) on his show on 5-2-17 and proceeded to ask him why in the hell would anyone vote for Republicans if all they're going to do is roll over for the Democrats and pretend it's a victory. I have to admit that Rush surprised me by being so direct with Pence. A real breeze of fresh air.

Now of course everyone is crawling out of the woodwork to give their side of the story about how this was a major bipartisan win for the Republicans and the president. Let me be clear: STOP THE BIPARTISAN BULLSHIT. KICK THE DEMOCRATS ASSES INTO NEXT WEEK, WAIT FOR THEM AND KICK THEM BACK TO THIS WEEK SO YOU CAN DO IT AGAIN. That's what we elected you to do, not this bipartisan bullshit. The Democrats don't do it, why should you? Give me one valid reason. Just one. And don't use the "next time we got 'em" line either.

Apparently Pence is also a beaten dog. As is Trump from the looks of things because he sure ain't doing anything using legislation unless I'm missing the healthcare repeal and the tax cuts although I am not feeling the joy from the gas tax hike. The usual lines from the crowd favorite "We don't a have the votes" (then use reconciliation like Obama did for his horseshit that he shoved down our throats for 8 years) to "This was a clear win" (no it wasn't, stop lying to us, Pence). We elected you people to destroy the Democrats, the progressives, the socialists, the communists. You won, you're winners, we want to see that winning so much we beG you to stop. We gave you every single fucking branch of government to drain the swamp, stop the Democrats and all you've done is lay there like beat dogs and when we task you on this all you do is tell us the same old lies, "The next time, oh, we're gonna really stick it to them." Really? This is your last chance. Period. Last. Fucking. Chance.

RUSH: If this is what happens, Mr. Vice President, why vote Republican? What is the point of voting Republican if the Democrats are gonna continue to win practically 95% of their objectives, such as in this last budget deal?

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Well, look, respectfully, Rush, I actually think this was, as the president said a little a while ago, I think this was actually a clear win for the American people. Look, you’ve had Washington, D.C., that has been, you know, paralyzed by gridlock and partisan infighting for many years, and in this new president you have someone who was able to bring people together and make a $21 billion increase in defense spending at a time of great challenge for America’s interests around the world........

Stop obfuscating and skirting the subject. Stop the Democrats. Stop the establishment Republicans. It's what we sent you there to do. - Editor

RUSH: If I’m the Democrats, $21 billion, 15 billion for defense that was not originally authorized, that’s a small price to pay for continuing to fund refugee resettlement, continuing to fund Planned Parenthood, continuing to fund sanctuary cities, continuing to fund the EPA, and not build the wall. The Democrats clearly think this is a big win, and they’re confident they can block Trump’s agenda after this spending bill for the rest of Trump’s term. There isn’t anything of the president’s agenda in this budget, and people are beginning to ask, when’s that gonna happen? If you’re gonna shut it down in September, why not now?


RUSH: If you complain about 60 votes today, why not go budget reconciliation for 51 votes and smoke ’em?


RUSH: Yes.

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Rush, let me be real clear. The number one priority of President Trump is to rebuild our military, to restore the arsenal of democracy. And I gotta tell you, to get Democrats in Washington, D.C., to agree to a $21 billion increase in a short-term budget bill — and, you know, the president’s calling for the largest increase in military spending since the Reagan administration in the upcoming budget, I think is no small — it’s no small accomplishment.

Oh so what, big deal you got 21 billion for the deep state in the Pentagon and some more for the EPA. Big deal. - Editor

RUSH: Mr. Vice President, we’ve been told this for 15 years, we’ll get ’em next time, after every continuing resolution —

THE VICE PRESIDENT: No, we got ’em this time.

The fuck you did. You got nothing. Nada. Try again. - Editor

RUSH: — we’ll get ’em next time, we’ll kick the can down the road, we’ll get ’em next time.

EXACTLY! - Editor

THE VICE PRESIDENT: We got ’em this time, $21 billion in defense spending at a time ...... And to say in this very first budget bill, instead of getting gridlock, instead of getting a government shutdown, which Washington’s been pretty good at for a while, we actually made process and we’re making a significant investment.....

Just shut the whole damned thing down. Shut it down. When Reagan did it, the Republicans GAINED seats. When we did it under Obama, we GAINED seats. Stop with the beat dog bullshit. - Editor

RUSH: Okay, but why then is the president now suggesting a budget shutdown in September or October? If it’s no good now, why is it good then? You guys were sent there to drain the swamp. There’s a clear Trump agenda that just isn’t see-able. It’s not visible in this budget, and some people are getting concerned that there’s more concern for bipartisanship and crossing the aisle, working with Democrats, than there is in draining the swamp and actually peeling away all of the roughage that is preventing actually moving forward here on so many of these issues that affect people domestically.

Read the rest....


Did you vote for the Republicans over the past 10 or so years to fix Washington, giving them Congress and then the Senate? Did you vote for Donald J. Trump for the same reason? After the health care and budget debacles are you rethinking your decision? Are you flummoxed by the appointments of big mouth conservatives only to see them suddenly become centrists?

During all the mid term elections for all these years, we elected Republicans, giving them control of the house because they promised to stop the shitstorm. Then we gave them the Senate because they needed more power to accomplish the mission of stopping the shitstorm. Well that wasn't good enough either so we delivered the White House. And of course the Republicans continue to cower like beaten dogs and roll over and over and over while the Democrats go right on ahead and do whatever they want, witness the budget that just passed and the Democrat happy dance.

The president signing this abortion of a budget would be directly opposed to the purpose of electing him, wouldn't it? Does he have any choice? Sure he does. All he needs to do is reach into the desk drawer, pull out the steel balls and put them on. But, and this is a big but, what would that accomplish other than creating even more animus against him? As it turns out, the lobbyists and special interests are far more powerful than the people are. As it turns out, Obama was more successful than anyone had thought in creating his deep state super progressive socialist Mao loving mini Castro's running around and pulling off shenanigan after shenanigan. Trump's only got so many fingers to stick in the dike and he's getting virtually no help from the Republicans because he's not "one of them." The Republicans that we elected to fix the shitstorm turn out to be just as establishment as anyone else once the lobbyists show up. They love the power and influence and it's going to take a lot more than electing Trump to fix the mess. Going to town halls isn't and bitching isn't going to help. Writing letters aren't going to help, neither will phone calls. Protesting isn't going to help. We've got to come up with a workable plan to force these people to do the will of the people instead of the will of the lobbyists and special interests. Banning lobbyists won't help because they'll just throw a few million dollars around and morph into something else.

We're hearing the usual excuses from the usual sources, it's not Trump's budget, we couldn't stop them, well you just wait til the next time, that's when we're really going to ream the Democrats. No you won't, so stop lying to us. First you have to rip out the deep state actors and the lobbyists by the roots and get rid of them. First you have to do what you say you're going to do. Only then can you fix this hot mess.

I've written for several years that these people are going to get X number chances to straighten out the shithole called Washington and to date other than a Supreme Court justice, nothing significant has changed. The swamp is just as bad, the garbage continues, planned parenthood baby killers are still funded, the wall ain't being built (until they figure out who's going to get rich off of it), the EPA gets all the money they want and the pork is flowing like a pig roast in Alabama. You couldn't be blamed if you threw up your hands and gave up electing Republicans.

But I will say this: Politics is a long term game of wits. But perhaps you need to be reminded how laws are made.

The Democrat gets up and says "I got a really shitty idea for a law."

Then the Republican gets up and says "And I can make it even worse!"

Which creates a two sentence proposed law. At that point, it gets "negotiated" and "reconciled" after which it's now 4,532 pages long and at the last minute some clown adds a few items that turns the United States into a communist enclave and the one holdout gets that bridge to nowhere that his wife's brother gets to build so he can get rich and volia' it becomes a law. Someone points out the communist enclave part and it's changed to a socialist enclave because that's not as bad and everyone says "whew" and the law is passed after everyone promises to fix it "the next time around." And that's how laws are made.


Apparently I may have been off the mark yesterday when I espoused how I don't feel the 100 days thing. An arbitrary number of days snatched out of the air in 1933 hardly seems to be in any way important other than for website visitors or ratings. I may be a little bit wrong because the president appeared on "Face The Nation" on 4-30-17 and apparently, according to CBS, has taken command. What Trump's taken command of is a mystery but he sure as hell has taken command of something, which assumes that he wasn't in command before. Perhaps it was the reptilian overlords or the Illuminati who were in command and Trump dispatched them at the 100 day mark when he found the super secret command ring or something. I don't know. I do know that he was a buffoon, idiot, bombastic and not fit for office for the first 99 days and now he's in command.

What we know from the interview is that president Xi of China and Trump are bestest friends and they respect each other in a groveling sort of way. According to Trump. In case you don't understand how this works, you say in public that every single person you know you respect, you like, you get along with, is smart, plays well with others, you share your toys with them, wife swap, go fishing with, drink beer with along with many other things that folks do out of respect. That way when you have to deal with them on say, North Korea, they can't very well treat you like shit in public (like they did to Obama because Obama doesn't publicly respect anyone) because then you can say that they don't respect you or your country's position. Easy peasy, simple to accomplish. And as a bonus, when you say you don't respect someone that becomes that much more serious because of all the people that you talk about that you do say you respect. And nobody wants to be the guy that Trump doesn't like and respect. Well, everyone but the fake news people but we already knew that.


Everyone and I mean everyone is going willy nilly over a period of time that is arbitrary. 100 days. Which as it turns out is an open invitation to drag out Photoshop and make a cool collage of Trump photos. Like it's the most important event since Neil Armstrong put his foot on that sound stage in 1969, the first 100 days has become some sort of guide-stone in the ground of America's psyche of self as if the soul of the nation is somehow tied to a period of 100 days. Headlines like "First 100 days of Trump's underwear weigh heavy" and "Trump's first 100 days the best ever in history" or "Trump still big fat loser after 100 days." Why 100? It was first used by FDR in 1933. Since then, it's been the holy grail of opinion. Just write about a president's first 100 days and the world will beat a path to your opinion, hoisting you onto the shoulders of popularity. And that's my take on the first 100 days. Thank you and have a good day.

We don't need to be worried about the rest of the world's misplaced anger about America. We need to be worried that the left is pissed off at America and as Trump drifts further and further from what he claimed to be, that the right will be pissed at America too. The result is predictable. The right's anger turns into apathy, and the left's anger turns into action. If you want to know what that looks like in the end, watch some reporting about what's going on in Venezuela right now.

That said, we should never become like Venezuela. We have the kind of American character that the citizens lead with. The right has nothing to do with it, nor does the left.

Much as Allahu Akbar denotes the superiority of the Muslim and the inferiority of the non-Muslim, the knowing smirk, the lifted eyebrow and the braying laugh of the audience when the unironic applause sign flashes is the prayer of the progressive to the cruel little god of his own ego. The ritual is tribal.

Read more of this excellent piece....

The smarter than us guys at MIT have come up with a 3D printer that prints houses. And it's solar powered. Talk about a Greenie's wet dream. No dead trees and alternative energy powered. My God, MIT has hit the holy grail gusher. Normally that would not tickle my fancy but I love the construction of houses, how taking a bunch of dead trees and making a structure with personality using hands and tools. But 3D printed houses that look like a 1950's horror movie monster den? Basically, the machine sits there and spits out this expanding foam shit that it layers untiI it's tall enough for a human to stand in and call it a house. I suppose that in the future construction workers will be wearing khakis and polo shits. Of course we'll have the great articles about how some millionare somewere had a 3D McMansion built and how some homeless waif in the middle of some shithole country now has a nice 3D printed house and for extra measure the story about how someone was printing houses for the homeless and the city shut them down because if the homeless have homes, they're not homeless.


This is an example of why I call the left progressive/communist/socialist/liberation theology followers. Look at this course description from a university. Disruption, destruction and forcing people to do your bidding is the mainstays of their power over others. Nothing is ever their fault, you never accept anything, always protest what isn't you. Belittle, insult and hold your breath to get your way. If that doesn't work, stamp your feet and beat someone up. If needed, go take a "safe break." Un-fucking believable. The infiltration of the higher educational system has been very successful. We now have thousands of useful idiots with useless degrees, in debt up to their eyeballs and too stupid to function in the real world. What you end up with are people like this.


There was a book, I can't remember the name where organ transplants was common and in order to fill the demand crimes like jaywalking wound up netting the death penalty so people could have new parts. Thus, my question is: Where are the bodies going to come from?

Copied from a discussion forum with virtually no shame.

What happened to the Donald Trump we elected?

These days many Trump supporters are asking the same question: "What happened to the Donald Trump we elected?" Openly question whether he is still the guy they voted for from a firm belief in him Making America Great Again and Draining The Swamp. The question is whether that is his own fault, weakness, lack of experience with the system or whatever.

Let's face it, every big promise he made during the election is being questioned, ridiculed and overruled when it is put into actions. By opponents, judges, democrats, militant Republicans, media experts and discontent followers. The forces against him are strong. There is even talk about him being held hostage by the "deep state", whatever that might actually mean. These are excellent discussion topics on conspiracy sites, media panels, at birthday parties, you name it. But is it really that complex?

Or is it as simple as this: In an average society there is 50% of the people that like you and there is 50% of the people that don't like you (or even hate you.) They are a perfect mix of expertise, social background etc. The people that like you can't move any further towards you, they already like you. No winning in people that like you. Admiration is cool, but it doesn't earn you much more than that. Then there are the people that don't like you. Period. No matter what you do, they just don't like you and take on every effort to emphasize their dislike and let it be heard whenever they get the chance. Through all kinds of media, so called expert opinions, in the streets, everywhere. Freedom of speech is a big asset for people that don't like you. Don't get me wrong, I am a firm believer in freedom of speech (till a certain level when it comes to respecting values in life, name calling, death wishes etc.), but the psychology of it in a society like ours is that the ones that don't like you have a bigger voice than the ones that like you. At least when it comes to goals you want to achieve and promises you made. At the tipping point everything you do or say is ridiculed, again under the umbrella of freedom of speech and you find yourself being satirized. That has nothing to do with "deep state" but simply with the force of like or rather don't like.

For example look at the tax plan that was introduced by the Trump administration. Simply spoken, with the cuts and everything you would think that even people that don't like you would at least give it a thought. Yet every opponent financial expert and media outlet goes out of their way to emphasize the negative sides of it. The risks for the budget, who is going to pay for it, etc. I am sure there are a lot of what ifs and buts to it when it comes to putting it into practice, but the voices of negativity are overpowering the voices of the positive side. The don't likes have the upper hand in practically every proposal this administration makes. Adjustments, compromises, it does not matter. Trump is a very bad word for the don't like people and anything and anyone attached to it is contaminated as well.

Is that Donald Trump's fault? I honestly don't think so. It is all a matter of psychology. Sure you can argue with some of his ideas and plans and blame some of that on a lack of expertise in some fields like immigration for example, but basic is that in the open communication society we live in, where everyone can put every fart out through social media etc., where you can just pull a panel of so called "independent" experts out of the magic hat for their "unbiased" opinion, there is no winning for someone like Trump. The camp of don't likes is too big for that. As a matter of fact every compromise or adjustment he makes is seen as a defeat by part of the like camp, making the don't like camp grow.

What does that mean for Trump's future? Difficult to say. After all he still is the President of the United States and from that position he still has a lot of power to make his own decisions, especially when it comes to international matters, like North Korea, Syria, China. Which might also be the most dangerous stronghold he has. The question there is if his skills when it comes to making business deals is balanced enough in a high stakes political poker game. If that game is not played right, in my opinion through diplomacy, economic pressure and negotiation skills, it might be the path to destruction on a global scale. Fact is that the number of people that want to chase him out of town is growing.

Last thing I want to say to his supporters and opponents is this. Base your opinion on whether you still believe or don't believe in Trump on your own judgement and try to see through all this "his first 100 days" banner crap. Base it on how plans and decisions effect you in real life. Follow your own instinct instead of following that of the loud mouths everywhere. That does not only go for Trump, but for all those that you support, like or don't like, in family, friends, people around you. We already live in a global society, where division seems to be a bigger key word than togetherness. Go from own strength, believe and what you stand for and think is just. The things that you can control or influence, around you. If we would listen to our own gut feeling more and keep our eyes more open to what happens around us and not base it purely on what is fed to us by those one-liner banner rhetoric, we as a society would be in a much better shape.


The big tax cut announcement was announced and it's a good news situation all over the place. I found that my current tax rate of 25 percent is going to be lowered to an astounding 25 percent, the exact change that I got under the Bush tax cut. On the plus side, that 1040 EZ I file every year will be simpler.

Okay, once more I'm sort of kidding. Until we have more information, it's pointless to piss and moan although I'm sure everyone with a D(umb) after their name will rail and whine that it's only for rich people like themselves, etc.. The point that I make to myself is that until there is information direct from Treasury and I KNOW that it isn't sabotaged by any tricky Obama agents of doom, I'm not going to get excited about any of it. Plus we know from the horse's mouth itself that you open the negotiation asking for everything and negotiate what you'll keep from a position of strength.

Looks we're going to learn a few things over the next couple of weeks. First, how much fuel North Korea has stockpiled because they ain't got no oil so that's a finite supply issue for them. Second, if they really have nuke or chemical abilities to strike out like a 4 year old in the grocery store that wants a candy bar. Third, how well those overpriced F-22 and F-35 fighters are going to do in real battle - for instance do those Chinese chips in them really have a fail safe? Can the Chinese shut them down remotely?


You know it's pretty bad when Rush Limbaugh is climbing aboard the "Trump caved" bandwagon as it totters it's way though our culture. While it's hard to believe that Rush doesn't recognize strategy when he sees it, it's equally hard to believe that since the Republicans have won every single election for quite some time now, putting them in charge of cities, states and the federal government, that they'd realize that they have the steel balls of Ninjas and proceed to take apart the Democrats to put them out of our misery once and for all. This is really getting pretty damned frustrating at this point. The democrats aren't in charge, stop letting them think they are. Good God, reduce their power to the point that we won't have to worry about their revenge when they get back into power, okay? People are going to die when they do and we'll blame you for letting it happen.

But nooooooo, Trump has to go and cave on his border wall, apparently without realizing that that single move, whether it's a delay or not, that single move will cause a significant number of people to switch their mindsets over to the "Trump caved" crowd and give the progressive/socialist/communist/democrat gang something that they'll love - voters that willingly abandon Trump, who it turns out isn't so unlike every other politician after all.

I would submit to you that what we are seeing in public is like an iceberg - 2/3 is below the water. There are so many scenarios that could be causing this "caving" business that you could spend all day listing them and not be done. Here's some of the list I've come up with.

  1. Play ball or you'll end up like JFK.
    2. Brainwashed by appointees surrounding him.
    3. Reptilian overlords have played their hand.
    4. It's an actual strategy and any good businessman isn't going to telegraph his moves you bunch of dumbasses.
    5. It's all part of the plot to take down China.
    6. It's all part of the plot to take down Mexico.
    7. It's all part of the plot to take down the EU.
    8. It's all part of the plot to take down (insert your favorite here).
    9. It's all part of the plot to expose the UFO thing.
    10. It's a super secret plan and you can't handle the truth.
    11. Yeah, turns out the Russian thing is for real and it's blackmail time.

Of course all of this could also be my way of getting around Google's new "Owl" progam.


If you don't think that we're in a civil war situation that I'd suggest you read an article about Antifa at The Antifa fanatics believe their job is to beat up people they don't agree with. In Berkley, the police sat in their patrol cars while the Antifa attacked pro-Trump supporters during an event. When we have law enforcement taking the side of revolutionaries, the seriousness of the situation rises to another level. The point being is that if we define terrorism as acts of violence designed to sow fear in the population, then we have to by default paint Antifa with a terrorism brush. Since when have we allowed terrorism to prevail in America?

An Antifa member wrote the following:

"We need to take notes from the John Brown Gun Club and get firearms and training. I know getting firearms in states and cities we have a presence in is usually a hassle, but even handguns would help," the would-be revolutionary wrote.

It would certainly put a psychological element in while holding fash [fascists] back. Who do you think a fascist is more afraid of? People with only flags and bats, or people with flags, bats, and guns?"

Read more....

The important question is exactly how large of a group are we talking about here? If there's a few million of them, then we got a problem. If there's a few thousand, it would be easy enough to "fix" the problem. The issue is who is going to do the fixing?

Another valid point is that the progressives/democrats have ginned up their base into a frenzy over the elecion of Trump. If we apply the definition of terrorism, then the democratic party are terrorists in that they convince their base to fear Trump and everyone that voted for him, thus qualifying under the broadest meaning of terrorism.


Once more, I've been proven exactly correct (Daily Thoughts, 4- 22-17) (either that or Howard Dean reads my stuff) in that the afore mentioned Dean tweeted one of his epic in his own mind one liners "Hate speech is not protected by the first amendment." The fuck it's not you nitwit. It's threats that aren't covered by free speech unless, of course, it's against a Republican. As Bill Mahar said (I can't believe I'm actually agreeing with one of the "other" Bills), "This is why the Supreme Court said the Nazis could march in Skokie. They're a hateful bunch – but that's what the First Amendment means. It doesn't mean just shut up, and agree with me."

Exactly correct. What the progressives don't understand is that their fantasy understanding of the constitution and the rights it endows to all Americans is that it isn't just for them. It's for everyone. If you don't agree with me, fine, but don't threaten me to get me to shut up - I wouldn't do that to you, I'd just ignore your crazy ass. I believe that what we're seeing is a product of the communistic social terrorists that are the Democratic party believing their own brainwashing.

One of if not the greatest thing about doing what I do here is being able to pick and choose what I write about. If it doesn't interest me I don't write about it. Ruminatin' about what interests yourself is both a lot of fun and rewarding. One thing I do not do, ever, is watch the Sunday shows and their parade of flapping pie holes exuding the latest in inane sayings and opinions from Washington.

The rationing of present day America, which has the resources, the wealth and the techniques to produce, is being managed in political terms. The politicians still talk in terms of innovation and production, even while enacting policies meant to discourage both. The dominant political class has been dedicated to one form of rationing or another throughout the 20th Century. The only difference between them is the degree of radicalism and their understanding that the rationing is a transition, rather than a safety net or an emergency measure. When you listen to the larger message of the left, it is one of finity. We have a finite amount of planetary resources and domestic wealth. This finity represents a global and national crisis that has to be tackled with rationing mechanisms. We are all on a lifeboat and some of us are gobbling up more than their fair share of rations. Unless the rationers step forward, seize everyone's rations and pass out limited rations, then we are all doomed.

Read more....


Target's self inflicted death spiral so some mentally ill people can use the wrong bathroom has resulted in even more executives shown the ladies room door - or the mens room door or that one with the weird diagram on it and as a bonus a 40 percent loss in value of Target. Good going, have a nice day and if they're not careful we'll need to check if they're done with a fork. In the annals of bad corporate moves, this has to rate as one of the top 10.

And the award for poorly thought out addiction recovery programs is the one where the alcoholics are allowed to continue to drink during their "recovery." What could possibly go wrong? Well other than a bunch of drunk people tottering into their recovery meetings. Hope they're not driving.


Every once in a while I actually have nothing to say. Not dumbstruck or so amazed I have no words, I just have not a thing to opine about. Oddly, my entire day has been like this, wafting like a gentle breeze from activity to activity, unwilling for some reason to make decisions of importance, although I did make an Omelet for dinner and made the cat a steak.

In actual news, I see Mr. Revolution himself, Barack Obama, has returned from his lengthy vacation wherein he immediately continued his work on the revolution. No word as yet on whether or not he's mad about the hot mess Democrats have made in his absence. He could very well be upset that the country he brought to it's knees in despair has been able to recover somewhat since he was removed from being the "leader" of the country. However, the supremely insane Maxine Waters has been keeping the engine of revolution revved up and ready for his return while the harem of college waifs will sit entranced as he waxes like a coffee shop beatnik poet on his thoughts and plans to destroy what's left of America. Which is good because it will give Trump something to Tweet about.


Pardon me while I have a 60 year old, I'm tired of the shit I see around me, those damned kids these days moment. And write about it.

I see that yet another doctor here in Michigan has been busted for genital mutilation of girls. This 7th century religion of peace practice is common in Muslim countries, in particular Egypt and Somalia where up to 87% of all girls are mutilated. So, apparently we here in America have managed to allow not only terrorists but now mutilators of children to go ahead and set up shop. Wonderful. Why are we paying out the nose in taxes to a government that can't keep us safe again? Really, I'd like to know why. It can't be because they're doing such a wonderful bangup job so there must be another reason. Oh yeah, it's my job to help them shit up my country. How could I forget that.

I will stand by what I previously opined, that we are now a developing country, not a leader of the world. Besides a lowering standard of living, despite no matter how hard one tries, the rate of pay increase never seems to match the rate of inflation we now seemingly accept that the abnormal is the new normal. All of this, of course, is going according to plan which is a pretty frightening prospect wherein they apparently have no real fear of Donald Trump changing anything in a meaningful way. I am now of the opinion that no matter how hard he tries, there is no possible way that he can make America great again until such time as I see a difference in my life. That's the bottom line. He can issue all the executive orders that will be rescinded as soon as he's gone that he wants, he can have all the laws that he wants passed that will be ignored when he's gone. Until such time as we as a people are good and fed up, there will be no change, no making anything great again. Yes, that's a rather dark view of the world but consider that I have seen and experienced a lot of things in my life, both good and bad that leads me to this conclusion. All it is is one man's opinion.

What the progressives have wrought through their constant victimization, educational system brainwashing and the constant drumbeat of everyone that has a different point of view is the enemy is nothing short of a totalitarian society, the same as ISIS is creating. Now their mantra is becoming, "Freedom of speech, Not freedom of consequences" or in other words "You're free to say anything unless we don't like it, then we beat you up."

I will put it to you this way. When I am reluctant to put a bumper sticker on my vehicle showing my support of a presidential candidate for fear of destruction of said vehicle but am expected to not raise even an eyebrow with sticker covered communist phrases and points of view rolling snot nosed liberal billboard of unrealistic expectations and millennial demands, not only is there something seriously wrong but it also points to my previous point earlier this week: we're in a civil war without the shooting.


To the Daily Thought in a moment, but first an observation. Over at, there is a thread about how the United States is falling into a developing world nation with two distinct economic stratas, shrinking middle class and a infrastructure that resembles Venezuela instead of Japan or Norway. A very interesting supposition. The very first reply is "If your not openly revolting then your not in the right mindset.", posted by the usual topic dragging shill. Poorly worded, misspelled and written and using the progressives/liberals/leftists/liberation theology which is "If you don't like it, destroy it. Disrupt everything you don't agree with." Nothing political or economic or infrastructure is going to be repaired or changed as long as people like this are not ignored like the 5 year old mental midgets they are.

Society is a reflection of the government that serves it. The governments we think we choose when all the while they are mearly curtains for the kings and queens and their friends the richest banking families. These are the forces that narrate our illusion of freedom because true freedom has no narrative. The government, media, military, religion and various other institutions are there to provide the people a civilized form of order and control, a platform for the so called narrative of "freedom and democracy"

My congratulations to judge Andrew Napolitano. You finally get it. Now what the fuck are we going to do about it? Because from where I'm sitting there appears to be no solution other than physically forcing them to leave but that's not going to happen due to all the brainwashing that's affected the country through the educational system as well as the systemic problem of hilarious overregulation, high taxation and the election of people that simply have no business representing any one.

By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano

What if our belief in self-government is a belief in a myth? What if the election of one political party over the other to control Congress changes only appearances? What if taxes stay high and regulations stay pervasive and the government stays oppressive and presidents fight wars no matter what the politicians promise and no matter who wins elections? What if the true goal of those whom we elect to Congress is not to be our agents of self-government or even to preserve our personal liberties but to remain in power by getting re-elected?

Read more....

Quick answer? We aren't self-governed. We are ruled and enslaved by greedy idiots. It's clear that we aren't and have the illusion of self governance. And an observation for you as well: Since the creation of income tax politicians use tax dollars and future government debt as bones to toss at the loudest whiners in exchange for votes. It's not just a federal thing either, it's local. Consider all of your shitty local ordinances and decisions like traffic cameras that give you automatic tickets. Did I vote for those? No I did not, nor would I. Nor would anyone I know. So who approved that shit?

That said, there have been attempts to stop the out of control government that's resulted in deaths and jail time for those trying to stop it. See Bundy and Finicum for more. Those that do succeed get their lives ruined or have a sudden fatal car crash while sleeping in bed. So what's the solution? I'm out of ideas. Standing up to them results in death, electing an outsider results in more of the same.


Another way that the political progressives/liberals/leftists/liberation theology branch of politics and the sharia law followers are the same is their moral compass in relaying information to people who are not like them. In the case of sharia, it's the infidels and in the case of the politically insane, anyone who isn't them including their followers. Lying about anything and everything is perfectly acceptable to both groups. Simple searches using their statements and "facts" will reveal this. While lying is a favorite activity to both branches in insanity, there is also the second aspect of the law, laws and constitutional boundaries not applying to them as well. As an example, the largest case of prescription fraud and female genital mutilation both happen(ed) in Livonia, Michigan where on a quiet day you can hear the screams of girls being mutilated.

Dr. Murtaza Hussain was busted for letting unlicensed employees diagnose patients and write prescriptions. Dr. Waseem Alam and Dr. Hatem Ataya pleaded guilty in the nation’s largest Medicare fraud case totaling $712 million in false billings centering on Shahid Tahir, Muhammad Tariq and Manavar Javed’s Livonia medical firms. But what was going on at one Livonia clinic was far worse than the theft of millions. Anyone passing by at the right time could hear the screams of little girls.

Operating out of a Livonia clinic, Jumana Fakhruddin Nagarwala abused unknown numbers of little girls. The end came when law enforcement traced calls to her from a Minnesota number. Then they followed the trail to a hotel in Farmington Hills; a Michigan city at the center of an Islamic Center controversy.

Read more....


Both also work hard to bring their and only their point of view and any illogical laws and regulations that can be used to control the population at large. Progressives always are quick to point out that any other political point of view is destructive, brutalizes minorities, hurts women, denies "rights" and generally tries to kill the planet, people, poison foods, and manipulate people to do horrible things to each other. However, the 10 most violent cities in the United States, Detroit, Oakland,  Memphis, St Louis, Cleveland, Baltimore, Birmingham, Milwaukee, Newark, N.J., and Kansas City are controlled by them and have been ground in their political machine for decades. When they are living large and in charge, such as under Barack Obama, regulations dictating everything down to your BBQ grill and just about any other social and lifestyle control are issued from the great halls of misguided leadership.

The Sharia law gang does much the same but in a more 7th century brutal way from stoning victims of rape to destroying symbols of lost civilizations. They mutilate women, behead non-followers and dictate edicts from the great halls of their misguided leadership. It doesn't take a lot of imagination to see them combining forces in the future although the image of Hillary Clinton sawing off the head of a Republican does take some work to imagine.

In the end, which this is, the only way they succeed is not through truth, justice and the American way but through threats, injury and death. At some point the population at large has to realize this and break free from their brainwashing.


Here's a definition for you: Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete, and they regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties.

Yes, it's on Wikipedia but it's pretty accurate despite the pedianazis efforts. Since we know that Conservatives are accepting of all viewpoints, I would submit that my proof would be the ability of the left to try to destroy the country and the wonderful religion of peace killing as many as possible because we Americans have what's called tolerance and free speech. You may say what you like when you like it. The difficulty crops up when the leftists are elected and they left seek to destroy all alternative viewpoints other than their own. One would assume that the Antifa "movement" would be against them as well instead of funded by them as detailed in this article.Here's another article about a music festival that was nearly killed by the supposedly anti-fascist group.

I've been wondering lately about the motivations of the Antifa revolution to overthrow America, while I purposely ignore their international goals. For a group that is supposedly anti-fascist they certainly act like they are fascist rather than not although I suppose you could argue that totalitarian and fascist share some aspects that make them seem the same. Just the name "Antifa" sounds rather communistic in nature to me as well as their logo which you have to admit is creative.

All this has led me down the rabbit hole of considering the relationship between Antifa and the political progressives/liberals/leftists/liberation theology branch of politics. Those of you who've read my ruminations over the past few years will probably remember that I've been comparing the apparent relationship between two destructive mindsets, one that claims to be a religion that's an ideology and one that's an ideology that is like a religion. I speak of course of the similarities between the Sharia law ISIS nitwits who believe that it's their way or death. The political progressives/liberals/leftists/liberation theology also believe that only their way is the right way, there can be no other viewpoint that's acceptable. Those that do not belong to the leftist way are to be destroyed both personally and professionally. Anyone with any sort of serious mental facilities that can use their life experience and observational skills can see the similar mindsets that plague the western world.

That said, we here in America (and other western cultures) are in the process of fighting a civil war between the abhorrent mindsets which fights constitutional government, which both groups ignore and debase when either of the two destructive mindsets are in charge and living large. When you have a situation where the leaders of one party are illegitimate 100% of the time and the other party instructs us that their leaders are manna from God, walk on water and are the cat's meow even when they proceed to destroy a culture, there is not only something wrong but there is also going to be a civil war. In this case, in America, not a shooting war but a war of brainwashing versus the truth. An excellent question is whether or not this could erupt into a shooting war. Yes it could but for one thing. The political progressives/liberals/leftists/liberation theology have brainwashed their followers that firearms are bad and should be avoided at all cost, thus they ain't armed so it would be a rather one sided affair if it came down to it. I doubt it will because they would like to be able to hurt people that don't desire to be in a socialist/communist country for as long as possible and moral and regulatory torture is far, far more enjoyable and productive for them. After all, with regulation comes power, all supplied by your local friendly anti-constitutional organizations.


According to Bloomberg, more people are filing their taxes late due to a number of reasons from online tax filing being pretty easy, not having the time to go through the bullshit forms to file, no money left after their paychecks are taxed, car registration is taxed, their drivers license is taxed, their food is taxed, their fuel is taxed, the electricity, cable, water are taxed, paying sales taxes, paying taxes on taxes. There are a lot of reasons why people wait until the last minute to file their taxes.

Lots of people file for an extension every year - I'm usually one of them. The point being is that virtually everything is either taxed or has an added fee on it, yet we are expected to happily go through the mental anguish of the IRS form circus from hell and pay some more taxes. Perhaps it's the burning anger that we are bombarded with in the form of advertisements that blare the message, "Spend your tax refund with us." Millions of us owe at the end of the year yet we are brainwashed to think that everyone (but us) gets a refund. Of course alls fair in love, war and advertising so there's nothing to be done about that.

The other point is that there will never be any change to the system until either Rand or Ron Paul is president or until the majority of Americans just say enough is enough and stop filing and overload the system so that there is an actual change.

Not only don't I expect that to happen, but if it did any changes would instead be nothing more than a shift just like with health care and any other "improvement" that the government makes to anything which is actually nothing more than a way to collect more and more money from the citizens. Perhaps if Trump has a sudden moment of clarity and returns to his promises instead of hiding his motivations.



If you were to paint a painting of the view from a loft in New York and sell it, would it be copyright infringment? The answer might surprise you. It's yes if you had painted the billboards and ads that dot the modern landscape. What's disturbing is that you can't go anywere, see anything that isn't filled with an advertisement in some way. Maybe if you're off the beaten byways and highways of America you can find spots without some sort of video, blaring voices or signs assulting your vision and mind. But roll down the highway and snap a photo and upload it and you're probably violating copyright laws. Taken to it's logical conclusion, if you take a photo of an auto accident between a Ford and Chevy and post it anywere, Ford and Chevy may sue you. If it's concievable and a way to make money, you can be sure someone is going to try it.

Take the copyright trolls of a few years ago. These companies scour the internet looking for handy victims. There were groups of attorneys that formed a company to sue people for copyright infringment by buying the rights to material and then suing internet users for quoting articles for as few as 5 words. There are current cases where tens of thousands of people are listed as "John Doe" and their ISP is forced to reveal their names so that they can be targeted for some handy income. So if you download a video, song, photo or article you can in fact be sued - and don't forget your browser and or computer creates temporary files with information in them that you probably aren't aware of.

What we have come down to is a society where everything, everywhere is owned, sponsored or used in advertising in order to get into your brain and scramble it up so you buy products. One wonders if you can be sued for what's in your brain. 

Read More....

So you've read the past few days where I bounce back and forth between being behind and then waffling to "What the hell is Trump doing?!" which is my fancy way of proving a point which is that Donald J. Trump is not, repeat not political and if you think he is, you're wrong, wrong, wrong. Fair weather friends like Michael Savage who is 100% behind Trump because he is the one that got him elected (just ask Savage) abandons him when he flies off the verbal handle even though he doesn't have a clear picture of the entire situation(s). What makes this dangerous is that Savage controls a large audience and has been fairly close, in my opinion, to disinformation recently because he too, despite his vast mental treasure chest of knowledge (fair disclaimer: My mother grew up with Savage) doesn't get it. Donald Trump has no ideology. He did not he say NATO is going to be disbanded, nor did he say that he wouldn't bomb the shit out of someone, nor did he say that he was going to do this or not do that during the campaign. It's all the art of the deal. Everything is a negotiated deal with this guy. Get that through your collective heads. If you expect him to be conservative, you'll be disappointed. If you expect him to be a liberal, you'll be disappointed. If you expect him to be a centrist....well you might be satisfied.....half the time.

What you're probably missing is that Donald Trump has no ideology nor specific point of political view other than what he perceives as right and wrong. There's no left/right/conservative/wacky left with this guy. What's right is right. That said, what you have to understand about Trump as president or in any roll is that he negotiates virtually everything. Hell, he probably negotiates with the toilet before peeing. Can you imagine this guy ordering a pizza? He must have been a hellion as a child, negotiating bedtime, homework, veggies, dinner, play time, etc. - sort of like a millennial kid these days. Trust me, I've got experience in this.

The big, big fishing trip organized by the White House failed to catch the "big one." In fact, it was so bad, the media is spinning itself into a Piranha frenzy over it.

The fishing trip I refer to is the Obama banana republic style FISA warrant to "look for" collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia (of course) during which, despite rules and laws to the contrary, names of Americans were named. When using a FISA warrant, names of incidental persons, namely American citizens are supposed to be redacted. In this particular case they weren't which is actually one of the biggest cases of corruption in the country's history. But who cares if the media doesn't, the sheep just keep bleating. And now all the "experts" are rolling around on the big cable news shows saying that this whole deal is a "big problem" for Trump because there was no collusion and the Obama administration broke the law so obviously the victim of the crime is to blame. Of course.

In other news, the president appeared on Fox Business network and said that he's gotta do health care first so that the government has more money so that there can be a tax cut which appears to show that Trump has fallen into the big Washington grinder wherein nothing can be actually cut, there must be money for everything. So sad. Had high hopes for him. Looks like welfare state will survive intact.

Other Trump flipping today included NATO - Trump: “I said NATO was obsolete, it’s no longer obsolete” and the Import/Export bank.


A lot of questions are swirling around people's cranial cavities with the whole Syrian/China/Korea thing. Some think that Mad Dog Mattis is behind the brainwashing of Trump. Others think it's the Kushner dude and his daughter, globe trotting to protect ISIS. Check Google if you think I'm wrong.  One thing nearly everyone agrees on is that someone is whispering in Trump's ear, brainwashing him into oblivion, this is it, the big fuck up that will sink Trump, this time for sure, he's gonna quit within a week, it's dooooooooom for Trump. It's a good thing the bleating sheep have a shepard like Trump.

One disturbing thought I've seen floating around is that he's being fed false information on purpose in order to damage his reputation as well as moving forward the deep state plot to either
A. Destroy the world through nuclear war or
B. Destroy Trump and the United States' reputation(s) or even a combination of both.
Because we all know that Trump is gullible, a real monkey in a man suit, unable to reach a decision despite the information he has available, a Manchurian president who is controlled by a 4 foot tall shirtless Russian bear riding strongman who hacks everything from carnival claw machines to national elections.

As far as the truth goes, we citizens have no damned idea what's happening around Trump. It could be a deep state plot or it could be he's acting on real information. What's clear is that people like Michael Savage have abandoned him simply because he's doing things they don't approve of nor do they have any information despite that every single time, Trump has owned the cucks. Every. Single. Time. This time, of course is different because when it comes to military action the skirt wearing vocal strongmen sit sidesaddle on the horse of military doom. I feel sorry for people that are so insecure and so unsure of themselves that they can't extend any benefits of doubt towards Trump, abandoning him to the Washington wolves at the first sign of something they personally don't like. It's sad really that so many fair weather friends need to be under a suicide watch every few days. And apparently the shell shocking that Obama had us under for 8 long miserable years of American is the bad guy worked like a charm.
Here's a tip for all of you planning on being president: Don't let the shills troll you into killing people with cruise missiles. See, that has a tendency to make the people that called you an amateur look like they're right. You need to stop, think and gather information from sources you trust. After all, you have the biggest and best intelligence services available on the planet.
Another handy tip is to realize that your supporters balls are going to fall off at the first sign of weakness, you know like falling for a trolling false flag. And don't forget your supports will suddenly  forget every time the asshole brigade has screamed "That's it! Trump's done!", they've been wrong, and he's emerged stronger?

Last tip: There's thousands of points of view on any matter that requires a decision. Pick one and stick to it.

Over the past few days, I've gotten a lot of dirt under my fingernails after falling down a rabbit hole and spending hours and hours listening and reading, the results of which I present here. I've tried to verify as much as I can and used multiple sources as much as I can. As far as I know everything in this Daily Thought is accurate.


“For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.”

JFK from his "The President and the Press," Before The American Newspaper Publishers Association, 27 April 1961

Nothing I write here is secret or special in any way. This is broken into several parts and subjects over a period of several days. What you read here should be common knowledge but it's not. This is about the nuclear disaster at Fukushima and the future of humanity as a species. Fukushima hasn't been contained, ended or made safe. It never will be. Among some of us in the conspiracy community it is known what the dangers are but the general population has no idea what is going on and frankly, the fate of the entirity of mankind is in the balance. Obviously, nothing is going to be done about it so everyone will suffer and die within the next century which is why all the effort to get to Mars is going on. You didn't think they wanted to go there to see a bunch of red rocks did you? It's about the survival of the human species because Fukushima is an extintion level event and it's not being stopped although it could be and the effects are being covered up. I mean who wants to be physically torn apart by angry mobs when they find out you're killing the planet for profit? I sure wouldn't.

Even among the conspiracy theorists, it's a kind of black subject where there isn't a lot being exposed about the situation at Fukushima Dachi. In Japan, a law is on the books making it illegal to investigate or talk about Fukushima and the nuclear disaster there.

Consider this as the largest signpost of what we are facing because the responsible parties are not working to fix the problem but rather continuing to make the same mistakes. They keep sending robots into the cores at Fukushima. Each robot has failed because of the radioactivity and heat, lasting only a short while before burning out. They do this time and time and time again. Yet with a few phone calls to NASA who builds robots and satellites DESIGNED to work in highly radioactive and hot environments, they could build said robots to do what they need them to do. But they don't.

With a radiation detector, there was between 2 and 3 times the normal background radiation back in 2014 and nobody really said anything about it other than on a few discussion forums. An interesting test was done where a giant pile of snow (the frozen water kind) was piled up and the radiation of it checked.  Not good news, the radiation was like getting at CAT scan every minute of every day. And since then, there's been no improvement. There was some thought that the radiation was coming from domestic sites like Brookhaven or others that are leaking radioactivity. For example, Brookhaven has been supposedly leaking Tritium for 45 years which has gotten itself into the water tables. The thing is that the only way to contain Tritium is with gold and nobody is going to use up tons of gold to contain something that won't effect them. A couple of generations from now, yeah, they're going to have problems. But we're not going to waste a bunch of gold to protect our eventual great-grandchildren. They're on their own on this deal.

Tritium is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen; it gives off radiation in the form of a beta particle. Tritium will bind anywhere hydrogen does, including in water, in plant, animal and human tissue. It cannot be removed from the environment once it is released. Tritium can be inhaled, ingested, or absorbed through skin. Eating food containing Tritium can be even more damaging than drinking Tritium bound in water. Consequently, an estimated radiation dose based only on ingestion of tritiated water may underestimate the health effects if the person has also consumed food contaminated with tritium. Tritium is primarily a byproduct of the nuclear power industry, which releases large amounts of tritium per year. Tritium has a half life of 12.3 years which means it will be dangerous for at least 120 years, since the hazardous life is ten to twenty times longer than its half-life. This has been well known for over a half century. Tritium was studied in the atomic tests of the 1950s so we know a lot about Tritium and it's effects.

All that said, don't go off on a anti-nuke rant among your friends and family because the properly designed reactor is not only very safe but it will also produce power so cheaply your cost would be 1/10 of what you're paying for electricity now. But the almighty profit stands firmly in the road to true free energy and energy independence for every man, woman and child on planet Earth. Imagine energy so cheap to produce that every home on the planet has lights, heat, cooking stoves and all types of appliances. Imagine a world where the cost of producing products is not tied to the energy it requires to produce that product but only the labor it costs to produce it.

The concern with the Pacific Ocean and Fukushima-Daiichi is because of the work that was done in the 1950s and the atomic bomb tests. It's why people are concerned about the effects that are coming. They're not here yet although some people are getting radiation poisioning from wild caught seafood. In a fair disclaimer, tests have been done on fish caught off the western coast of Canada and the United States which (according to the report) showed little if any contamination. Since the accumuliation of the radiation is continuing and will continue the report can be considered an outlier of information and won't be linked to here however a simple Google search will provide results from both sides of the argument. I explain why I say this in two paragraphs.

People think that the atomic bomb tests in the 1950s and the radioactive fallout was really, really bad. By sheer comparitive numbers, in Fukushima-Daiichi, there is 14,000 times worth of fallout than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. 14,000 times. That's just in one pool and there are three of them there. In pool 3 at Fukushima-Daiichi they have Plutonium 239 or MOX (Mixed OXide) fuel. If the human tolerance is said to be conservative at 1/100,000 of a gram, consider that there's 170 tons of it. In one pool at Fukushima-Daiichi. Will all of it escape into the ocean at large? Probably not, however nobody knows where it physically is at this point.

See, the shills are always talking about how it's not that bad, the ocean is a big place and we can dump lots and lots of radiation into it without a problem. What they don't understand and fail to take into consideration is the entire spectrum of radiation types being put into the Pacific. For instance they only look at Caesium-137. The thing is that there are over 2,000 different byproducts of the nuclear process. Some like Iodine have a short halflife, many do not. In the tests I mentioned above, Cadesium was the only radiological tested for which in my opinion makes it an outlier.

Let's take the fission process. Take an atom of Uranium which splits. Within this there are two types of split, one is heavy and one is light. There's also splits in between. The problem is that when the atom is all together, that atom is what's known as fissionable ( which means that if you hit it with a neutron, it can either absorb it or it can split. When it does split, most of the time it releases 2.5x more neutrons which furthers the chain reaction. Then there's criticality. Consider a room full of mousetraps and you throw a ping pong ball in the room. It'll set off a few mousetraps. Just a few. That's called sub-critical. But if you have one ping pong ball in every mousetrap in that room and throw in the same ping pong ball that we did earlier, (which is the same thing as the enrichment of a nuclear device) you have a chain reaction when all those mousetraps go off,which is the same thing as a thermonuclear bomb going off. This is E=Mc2, Einstein's famous formula. When they were doing the nuclear tests in the 1950s, they were able to take a ball of Uranium about the size of a softball and get 20 MEGATONS out of it. There's a lot of fallout from just that little bit of fissionable material. Their tests got out of hand in more than one case.

In Fukushima-Daiichi, there's hundreds of times more fallout. What you probably don't know is that there was a critical explosion. An atomic explosion. These were NOT hydrogen explosions like you've been led to believe. It was an actual critical explosion. We know this because pool 3 (with the 170 tons of Plutonium) went up nearly 1,000 feet. 170 tons launched 1,000 feet in the air takes far more energy than a hydrogen gas explosion. They found parts of it 2 kilometers away. This is bad. It's called plumegate now. More than 14,000 people died because of this and it was of course covered up worldwide. A nuclear disaster the likes of which have never been seen before in recorded history, releasing uncontrolled fallout worldwide is covered up. One guy that talked about this went by the name of Patrick Henry and did a lot of research on the subject. Sadly, we can't talk to him because well....he's nowhere to be found these days.

This is a two trillion dollar industry. We have 23 of the Fukushima style MK1 nuclear plants operating in the United States and about 100 MK4 plants which are similar in design. These are all water reactors or BWR (Boil Water Reactors) and they suck, they are a terrible design. This is because you have a range of 100 degrees to work them within. The efficiency is something like 10%. An efficient reactor would be a molten salt nuclear reactor. The molten salt (Lithium Bromide Salt) design can produce far, far more power than the BWR type. Power so cheap that it's basically free. BWR reactors are from 1947. What we need to build and use are known as LFTR or reactors based on thorium and are molten salt reactors.  So why aren't we using them? Well for one, you can't use the byproducts to make bombs. The department of energy doesn't want them because you can't make bombs from them. That and their science is based on Plutonium not the chemistry of a molten salt reactor. But here's the rub. A molten salt reactor is 98% effecient. They'll run on the dirt in your back yard which has Thorium in it. There is ton of Thorium in coal waste. You could use that same coal to make as much synthetic fuel you would like or need. If you take your coal and process it though a LFTR reactor, because of the heat involved you could create gasoline, not out of oil but as a byproduct of running coal through the process of creating electricity. That gasoline that would cost nearly nothing.

You've probably seen the dollar shave club commercials or website. They're the LFTR reactor of shavers. What the big name companies do is basically give you the shaver for free and charge you a wheelbarrow full of money for the replacement blades. This is how the nuclear power industry works. They build you the reactor for like free and then charge you out the ass for the fuel for the reactor. Just like you can't put a Trac II blade in another razor, you can't put the fuel from your reactor in another reactor. What government would give that up? So you're going to kill your great grandchildren. Who cares when you can make money hand over fist?

What using LFTR reactors would do is free up the potential of humanity. Imagine an electric bill of $6 a month and gasoline of perhaps a penny a gallon at the same time. Again, imagine a world where electricity is as common as clouds in the sky, where everyone, everywhere would have access to everything that you and I do here in modern society. No more poverty, no more genocidal wars over oil. However, keep in mind that governments can trace nearly 80% of their income to the production and use of energy. Now you can understand what President Kennedy was talking about. This is a vast, vast conspiracy that is not only killing us because of the Fukushima-Daiichi disaster but also because of how they are holding humanity back from it's true potential.

The thing with Fukushima-Daiichi is that the people in power are overwhelmed with the effort that it would take to fix it. What it would take is a worldwide effort of every single western society, and a whole bunch of electrical power, I mean a lot of power to build a type of containment system that would contain the radioactive fallout.

To be continued...